Assessing Regional Public Transport Evaluation Indicators for Advanced Mobility Systems: A Review

The emergence of advanced mobility systems, including Demand Responsive Transport (DRT), shared mobility, and Mobility as a Service (MaaS), has required a reassessment of the evaluation indicators for public transportation systems. Existing studies often address only limited aspects and lack a comprehensive, structured classification, while the unique impacts of advanced systems remain insufficiently captured. Moreover, little attention has been given to which indicators are suitable for simulation despite their growing role in transport planning. To fill these gaps, this study develops a structured classification of quantitative evaluation indicators from the existing literature, serving as a foundation for assessing advanced mobility systems. It highlights system-specific characteristics, identifies relevant indicators, and examines their correspondence with conventional ones. Furthermore, it explores the applicability of these indicators in simulation environments, offering guidance for selecting representative indicators in simulation setup, operational monitoring, and impact assessment. Finally, it highlights the potential of quantitative indicators to approximate qualitative ones, suggesting directions for future research in simulation-based evaluation. By integrating environmental, economic, and societal dimensions, this study contributes to a sustainability-oriented framework for evaluating advanced mobility systems, providing insights for both academic research and practical mobility planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198854
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Transportation Planning and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Regional Public Transport Evaluation Indicators for Advanced Mobility Systems: A Review

Toshiyuki Nakamura, Masahiro Kuwahara, Fumitaka Kurauchi, Ran Du
1 citations
Sustainability
Transportation Planning and Optimization
2.18
article

Assessing Regional Public Transport Evaluation Indicators for Advanced Mobility Systems: A Review

Toshiyuki Nakamura, Masahiro Kuwahara, Fumitaka Kurauchi, Ran Du
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The emergence of advanced mobility systems, including Demand Responsive Transport (DRT), shared mobility, and Mobility as a Service (MaaS), has required a reassessment of the evaluation indicators for public transportation systems. Existing studies often address only limited aspects and lack a comprehensive, structured classification, while the unique impacts of advanced systems remain insufficiently captured. Moreover, little attention has been given to which indicators are suitable for simulation despite their growing role in transport planning. To fill these gaps, this study develops a structured classification of quantitative evaluation indicators from the existing literature, serving as a foundation for assessing advanced mobility systems. It highlights system-specific characteristics, identifies relevant indicators, and examines their correspondence with conventional ones. Furthermore, it explores the applicability of these indicators in simulation environments, offering guidance for selecting representative indicators in simulation setup, operational monitoring, and impact assessment. Finally, it highlights the potential of quantitative indicators to approximate qualitative ones, suggesting directions for future research in simulation-based evaluation. By integrating environmental, economic, and societal dimensions, this study contributes to a sustainability-oriented framework for evaluating advanced mobility systems, providing insights for both academic research and practical mobility planning.

SustainabilityVol. 17(19)
Toyota Motor Corporation (Japan) (JP), Gifu University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Transportation Planning and Optimization
2.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.