The Image of the Ruler as a “Figure of Memory”: Genghis Khan and Amir Timur

This article explores the transformation of the images of two great rulers, Genghis Khan and Amir Timur, in the historical memory of post-socialist Mongolia and Uzbekistan. It analyzes how these figures are employed by contemporary states in the processes of nation-building and the construction of political legitimacy. Using a comparative approach within the logic of «most different cases», the study identifies parallels between two culturally and historically distinct countries that, in the context of redefined identities following the collapse of the USSR, adopt similar strategies of sacralizing the historical past. In Mongolia, Genghis Khan is portrayed as the spiritual founder of the nation and a symbol of cultural and political continuity, while in Uzbekistan, Amir Timur is represented as the architect of imperial power and international influence. The study draws on diverse empirical materials – including museums, monuments, textbooks, academic and official publications – to demonstrate the institutionalization of personality cults in educational, cultural, and state policies. Through the images of these rulers, mass perceptions of national identity, social unity, and historical greatness are shaped, turning memory politics into an effective tool for both internal and external legitimation of power.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University Series Political Science and Religion Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3380.2025.53.80
Primary Topic
Eurasian Exchange Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Image of the Ruler as a “Figure of Memory”: Genghis Khan and Amir Timur

N. V. Dyachenko
The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University Series Political Science and Religion Studies
Eurasian Exchange Networks
article

The Image of the Ruler as a “Figure of Memory”: Genghis Khan and Amir Timur

N. V. Dyachenko
article en

Abstract

This article explores the transformation of the images of two great rulers, Genghis Khan and Amir Timur, in the historical memory of post-socialist Mongolia and Uzbekistan. It analyzes how these figures are employed by contemporary states in the processes of nation-building and the construction of political legitimacy. Using a comparative approach within the logic of «most different cases», the study identifies parallels between two culturally and historically distinct countries that, in the context of redefined identities following the collapse of the USSR, adopt similar strategies of sacralizing the historical past. In Mongolia, Genghis Khan is portrayed as the spiritual founder of the nation and a symbol of cultural and political continuity, while in Uzbekistan, Amir Timur is represented as the architect of imperial power and international influence. The study draws on diverse empirical materials – including museums, monuments, textbooks, academic and official publications – to demonstrate the institutionalization of personality cults in educational, cultural, and state policies. Through the images of these rulers, mass perceptions of national identity, social unity, and historical greatness are shaped, turning memory politics into an effective tool for both internal and external legitimation of power.

The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University Series Political Science and Religion StudiesVol. 53
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Eurasian Exchange Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.