Platform-based banking ecosystems: a comparative analysis between incumbents and challenger banks from a dynamic capabilities perspective

Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify which dynamic capabilities are relevant in platform ecosystem development and how established and challenger banks differ in this process. Design/methodology/approach The methodology comprises a qualitative approach based on multiple case studies. Findings The outcomes reveal that organizational culture can favor dynamic capabilities in platform ecosystems. However, the coexistence of numerous organizational cultures in incumbents can be harmful, requiring them to strengthen integrative and dynamic managerial capabilities. Incumbents can benefit from joint orchestration of entrepreneurial and platform ecosystems. The capabilities for establishing strategic alliances and M&A operations can foster platform ecosystems development. Practical implications The study provides managers with a deeper understanding of how to lead their companies toward a platform ecosystem model, which can also improve user experience and access to financial services. Originality/value The study addresses a relevant and underexplored topic, offering new insights into platform ecosystems through the lens of dynamic capabilities. It includes a comprehensive analysis of the main differences between incumbents and new entrants in the development of platform ecosystems, which is valuable for both academics and practitioners. Regulators can also benefit from a better understanding of the phenomenon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Research The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mrjiam-11-2024-1626
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Platform-based banking ecosystems: a comparative analysis between incumbents and challenger banks from a dynamic capabilities perspective

Maria Tereza Leme Fleury, Marcelo Scheer Evaristo
Management Research The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management
Digital Platforms and Economics
article

Platform-based banking ecosystems: a comparative analysis between incumbents and challenger banks from a dynamic capabilities perspective

Maria Tereza Leme Fleury, Marcelo Scheer Evaristo
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify which dynamic capabilities are relevant in platform ecosystem development and how established and challenger banks differ in this process. Design/methodology/approach The methodology comprises a qualitative approach based on multiple case studies. Findings The outcomes reveal that organizational culture can favor dynamic capabilities in platform ecosystems. However, the coexistence of numerous organizational cultures in incumbents can be harmful, requiring them to strengthen integrative and dynamic managerial capabilities. Incumbents can benefit from joint orchestration of entrepreneurial and platform ecosystems. The capabilities for establishing strategic alliances and M&A operations can foster platform ecosystems development. Practical implications The study provides managers with a deeper understanding of how to lead their companies toward a platform ecosystem model, which can also improve user experience and access to financial services. Originality/value The study addresses a relevant and underexplored topic, offering new insights into platform ecosystems through the lens of dynamic capabilities. It includes a comprehensive analysis of the main differences between incumbents and new entrants in the development of platform ecosystems, which is valuable for both academics and practitioners. Regulators can also benefit from a better understanding of the phenomenon.

Management Research The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management
European Association of Social Psychology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Digital Platforms and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.