Predictive Modeling of Shear Strength for Lotus-Type Porous Copper Bonded to Alumina

This study investigates the shear strength of lotus-type unidirectional porous copper bonded to alumina substrates using the Direct Bonded Copper (DBC) process. Porous copper specimens with various porosities (38.7–50.9%) and pore sizes (150–800 μm) were fabricated and joined to alumina discs. Shear testing revealed that both porosity and pore size significantly affect the interfacial strength. While higher porosity led to reduced shear strength, larger pore sizes enhanced the maximum shear strength owing to increased local contact areas and crack coalescence in the alumina substrate. Fractographic analysis using optical microscopy and SEM-EDS confirmed that failure mainly occurred in the alumina, with local fracture associated with pore distribution and size. To improve strength prediction, a modified model was proposed, reducing the error from 12.3% to 7.5% and increasing the coefficient of determination (R2) from 0.43 to 0.74. These findings highlight the necessity of considering both porosity and pore size when predicting the shear strength of porous copper/alumina DBC joints, and they provide important insights for optimizing metal structures in metal–ceramic bonding for high-performance applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metals
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/met15101103
Primary Topic
Metallurgy and Material Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive Modeling of Shear Strength for Lotus-Type Porous Copper Bonded to Alumina

Soong‐Keun Hyun, J.H. Lee, Keun-Soo Kim, Sang-Gyu Choi et al.
Metals
Metallurgy and Material Science
article

Predictive Modeling of Shear Strength for Lotus-Type Porous Copper Bonded to Alumina

Soong‐Keun Hyun, J.H. Lee, Keun-Soo Kim, Sang-Gyu Choi, Sangwook Kim
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the shear strength of lotus-type unidirectional porous copper bonded to alumina substrates using the Direct Bonded Copper (DBC) process. Porous copper specimens with various porosities (38.7–50.9%) and pore sizes (150–800 μm) were fabricated and joined to alumina discs. Shear testing revealed that both porosity and pore size significantly affect the interfacial strength. While higher porosity led to reduced shear strength, larger pore sizes enhanced the maximum shear strength owing to increased local contact areas and crack coalescence in the alumina substrate. Fractographic analysis using optical microscopy and SEM-EDS confirmed that failure mainly occurred in the alumina, with local fracture associated with pore distribution and size. To improve strength prediction, a modified model was proposed, reducing the error from 12.3% to 7.5% and increasing the coefficient of determination (R2) from 0.43 to 0.74. These findings highlight the necessity of considering both porosity and pore size when predicting the shear strength of porous copper/alumina DBC joints, and they provide important insights for optimizing metal structures in metal–ceramic bonding for high-performance applications.

MetalsVol. 15(10)
Hoseo University (KR), Inha University (KR), Lotus Clinical Research (US)
Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Metallurgy and Material Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Predictive Modeling of Shear Strength for Lotus-Type Porous Copper Bonded to Alumina — Soong‐Keun Hyun, J.H. Lee, et al. · Metals (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS