UAV Image Denoising and Its Impact on Performance of Object Localization and Classification in UAV Images

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become a tool for solving numerous practical tasks. UAV sensors provide images and videos for on-line or off-line data processing for object localization, classification, and tracking due to the use of trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and artificial intelligence. However, quality of images acquired by UAV-based sensors is not always perfect due to many factors. One of them could be noise arising because of several reasons. Its presence, especially if noise is intensive, can make significantly worse the performance characteristics of CNN-based techniques of object localization and classification. We analyze such degradation for a set of eleven modern CNNs for additive white Gaussian noise model and study when (for what noise intensity and for what CNN) the performance reduction becomes essential and, thus, special means to improve it become desired. Representatives of two most popular families, namely the block matching 3-dimensional (BM3D) filter and DRUNet denoiser, are employed to enhance images under condition of a priori known noise properties. It is shown that, due to preliminary denoising, the CNN performance characteristics can be significantly improved up to almost the same level as for the noise-free images without CNN retraining. Performance is analyzed using several criteria typical for image denoising, object localization and classification. Examples of object localization and classification are presented demonstrating possible object missing due to noise. Computational efficiency is also taken into account. Using a large set of test data, it is demonstrated that: (1) the best results are usually provided for SSD Mobilenet V2 and VGG16 networks; (2) the performance characteristics for cases of applying BM3D filter and DRUNet denoiser are similar but the use of DRUNet is preferable since it provides slightly better results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computation
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/computation13100234
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

UAV Image Denoising and Its Impact on Performance of Object Localization and Classification in UAV Images

Владимир Васильевич Лукин, Dmitriy Kritskiy, Rostyslav Tsekhmystro
1 citations
Computation
Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
1.14
article

UAV Image Denoising and Its Impact on Performance of Object Localization and Classification in UAV Images

Владимир Васильевич Лукин, Dmitriy Kritskiy, Rostyslav Tsekhmystro
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become a tool for solving numerous practical tasks. UAV sensors provide images and videos for on-line or off-line data processing for object localization, classification, and tracking due to the use of trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and artificial intelligence. However, quality of images acquired by UAV-based sensors is not always perfect due to many factors. One of them could be noise arising because of several reasons. Its presence, especially if noise is intensive, can make significantly worse the performance characteristics of CNN-based techniques of object localization and classification. We analyze such degradation for a set of eleven modern CNNs for additive white Gaussian noise model and study when (for what noise intensity and for what CNN) the performance reduction becomes essential and, thus, special means to improve it become desired. Representatives of two most popular families, namely the block matching 3-dimensional (BM3D) filter and DRUNet denoiser, are employed to enhance images under condition of a priori known noise properties. It is shown that, due to preliminary denoising, the CNN performance characteristics can be significantly improved up to almost the same level as for the noise-free images without CNN retraining. Performance is analyzed using several criteria typical for image denoising, object localization and classification. Examples of object localization and classification are presented demonstrating possible object missing due to noise. Computational efficiency is also taken into account. Using a large set of test data, it is demonstrated that: (1) the best results are usually provided for SSD Mobilenet V2 and VGG16 networks; (2) the performance characteristics for cases of applying BM3D filter and DRUNet denoiser are similar but the use of DRUNet is preferable since it provides slightly better results.

ComputationVol. 13(10)
National Aerospace University – Kharkiv Aviation Institute (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
1.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.