Kenya’s Infrastructural Question

Kenya’s Standard Gauge Railway (SGR), the country’s largest infrastructure project since its 1963 independence, was initially seen as a mutually advantageous endeavour for both Kenya and China. For China, the SGR complemented its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), while President Uhuru Kenyatta viewed it as a monumental infrastructure development that would solidify his legacy. This article critically assesses Kenyatta’s infrastructure legacy, with a particular focus on the parliamentary transport committee’s proposal to renegotiate the SGR loan terms with China. Drawing on both secondary and primary sources, including the SGR loan agreements, the analysis indicates that the project was driven more by political interests than by genuine developmental needs. Kenyatta kept the SGR deal’s details confidential and bypassed important oversight institutions. The leaked Auditor General’s letter claiming that Mombasa Port had been used as collateral for the railway, raised concerns about a potential debt trap scenario with China. The article concludes that the SGR was primarily a Kenyan initiative, with the ensuing debt distress attributable to poor decision-making processes within the president’s executive office, thereby necessitating calls for renegotiation of the loan terms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Political Science
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36615/4r3v9t65
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kenya’s Infrastructural Question

Tinuade Ojo, Chidochashe Nyere, Hellen Adogo
African Journal of Political Science
International Development and Aid
article

Kenya’s Infrastructural Question

Tinuade Ojo, Chidochashe Nyere, Hellen Adogo
article en

Abstract

Kenya’s Standard Gauge Railway (SGR), the country’s largest infrastructure project since its 1963 independence, was initially seen as a mutually advantageous endeavour for both Kenya and China. For China, the SGR complemented its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), while President Uhuru Kenyatta viewed it as a monumental infrastructure development that would solidify his legacy. This article critically assesses Kenyatta’s infrastructure legacy, with a particular focus on the parliamentary transport committee’s proposal to renegotiate the SGR loan terms with China. Drawing on both secondary and primary sources, including the SGR loan agreements, the analysis indicates that the project was driven more by political interests than by genuine developmental needs. Kenyatta kept the SGR deal’s details confidential and bypassed important oversight institutions. The leaked Auditor General’s letter claiming that Mombasa Port had been used as collateral for the railway, raised concerns about a potential debt trap scenario with China. The article concludes that the SGR was primarily a Kenyan initiative, with the ensuing debt distress attributable to poor decision-making processes within the president’s executive office, thereby necessitating calls for renegotiation of the loan terms.

African Journal of Political ScienceVol. 13(1)
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Kenya’s Infrastructural Question — Tinuade Ojo, Chidochashe Nyere, et al. · African Journal of Political Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS