Cervical Cancer Screening Practice and Associated Factors Among Healthcare Providers in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Introduction Cervical cancer is a major public health issue worldwide and is the second most common disease in developing nations like Ethiopia. Early screening and treatment are critical for treating cervical cancer. However, there is no systematic review evidence on cervical cancer screening practices. Hence, the goal of this review was to assess cervical cancer screening practices and the factors influencing them among healthcare providers in Ethiopia. Search Strategy and Data Sources This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 6,818 articles were collected from various international databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, African Journals Online, Google Scholar, and the Wiley Online Library, covering the period from December 1, 2024 to February 6, 2025. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) was employed to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. Data extraction were carried out using Excel, and the analysis was performed with STATA 11 software. The pooled effect size for cervical cancer screening practices was estimated using a random effects model. Cochran’s Q test and the I 2 statistic were applied to evaluate the heterogeneity among the studies, while the symmetry of the funnel plot and Egger’s test were utilized to detect publication bias. Results In total, 7,781 study participants were involved in 16 studies for this evaluation. The pooled cervical cancer screening practice among healthcare providers was 18.35% (95% CI: 10.98, 25.73). Good knowledge (AOR = 5.09; 95% CI: 2.26, 11.47), having ≥3 years of work experience (AOR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.10, 3.78), and receiving cervical cancer training (AOR = 3.95; 95% CI: 2.10, 7.33) were significant factors for cervical cancer screening practices. Conclusions More than two-thirds of healthcare providers did not implement cervical cancer screening practices aimed at prevention. To reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with cervical cancer in women, the Ethiopian Ministry of Health and its partners should increase the knowledge of healthcare providers, particularly new employees. This can be achieved by offering training on effective screening practices to prevent complications related to cervical cancer. The review has been recorded under International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the number CRD42024565570.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing & Midwifery Research Journal
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0974150x251375145
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cervical Cancer Screening Practice and Associated Factors Among Healthcare Providers in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Agerie Mengistie Zeleke, Worku Chekol Tassew
Nursing & Midwifery Research Journal
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Cervical Cancer Screening Practice and Associated Factors Among Healthcare Providers in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Agerie Mengistie Zeleke, Worku Chekol Tassew
article en

Abstract

Introduction Cervical cancer is a major public health issue worldwide and is the second most common disease in developing nations like Ethiopia. Early screening and treatment are critical for treating cervical cancer. However, there is no systematic review evidence on cervical cancer screening practices. Hence, the goal of this review was to assess cervical cancer screening practices and the factors influencing them among healthcare providers in Ethiopia. Search Strategy and Data Sources This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 6,818 articles were collected from various international databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, African Journals Online, Google Scholar, and the Wiley Online Library, covering the period from December 1, 2024 to February 6, 2025. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) was employed to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. Data extraction were carried out using Excel, and the analysis was performed with STATA 11 software. The pooled effect size for cervical cancer screening practices was estimated using a random effects model. Cochran’s Q test and the I 2 statistic were applied to evaluate the heterogeneity among the studies, while the symmetry of the funnel plot and Egger’s test were utilized to detect publication bias. Results In total, 7,781 study participants were involved in 16 studies for this evaluation. The pooled cervical cancer screening practice among healthcare providers was 18.35% (95% CI: 10.98, 25.73). Good knowledge (AOR = 5.09; 95% CI: 2.26, 11.47), having ≥3 years of work experience (AOR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.10, 3.78), and receiving cervical cancer training (AOR = 3.95; 95% CI: 2.10, 7.33) were significant factors for cervical cancer screening practices. Conclusions More than two-thirds of healthcare providers did not implement cervical cancer screening practices aimed at prevention. To reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with cervical cancer in women, the Ethiopian Ministry of Health and its partners should increase the knowledge of healthcare providers, particularly new employees. This can be achieved by offering training on effective screening practices to prevent complications related to cervical cancer. The review has been recorded under International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the number CRD42024565570.

Nursing & Midwifery Research JournalVol. 22(1)
Debark University (ET), University of Gondar (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.