Considerations for evaluating pragmatic design elements in digital health intervention trials: the case of Keep It Up! 3.0

Application of both the PRECIS-2 and PRECIS-2-PS tools validated the pragmatic design of KIU! 3.0 as originally designed and after modifications during trial implementation. Our findings highlight instances where one tool may be more suitable than the other to assess the pragmatic-explanatory continuum for emerging digital health interventions delivered in diverse settings and with different implementation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Implementation Science Communications
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00777-y
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considerations for evaluating pragmatic design elements in digital health intervention trials: the case of Keep It Up! 3.0

Suman Rana, Macapagal Kathryn, Huai Li, Mark Krystal et al.
Implementation Science Communications
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Considerations for evaluating pragmatic design elements in digital health intervention trials: the case of Keep It Up! 3.0

Suman Rana, Macapagal Kathryn, Huai Li, Mark Krystal, Benbow Nanette, zamantakis alithia, Rudd Emma, Smith Justin D., Mustanski Brian
article en

Abstract

Application of both the PRECIS-2 and PRECIS-2-PS tools validated the pragmatic design of KIU! 3.0 as originally designed and after modifications during trial implementation. Our findings highlight instances where one tool may be more suitable than the other to assess the pragmatic-explanatory continuum for emerging digital health interventions delivered in diverse settings and with different implementation strategies.

Implementation Science CommunicationsVol. 6(1)
Northwestern University (US), Spencer Foundation (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Northwestern University (PH), Northwestern Medicine (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.