Stakeholder Perspectives on Early Feasibility Studies for Digital Health Technologies in the European Union: Qualitative Interview Study

EFSs remain underused in the EU DHT sector, primarily due to regulatory complexity, fragmentation, and a lack of tailored guidance. A harmonized, DHT-specific EFS framework featuring clearer definitions, standardized processes, and structured dialog between innovators and regulators could accelerate safe, effective, and user-centric digital health innovation. As the MDR and AI Act converge, coordinated regulatory approaches will be critical to balancing innovation, safety, and patient benefit in Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/77982
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholder Perspectives on Early Feasibility Studies for Digital Health Technologies in the European Union: Qualitative Interview Study

Sebastian Kühn, Nicolas Martelli, Ilja Michaelis, Ornella Tangila Kayembe et al.
1 citations
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Stakeholder Perspectives on Early Feasibility Studies for Digital Health Technologies in the European Union: Qualitative Interview Study

Sebastian Kühn, Nicolas Martelli, Ilja Michaelis, Ornella Tangila Kayembe, Tom Melvin, Ann McDonnell, Marlen Peseke, Franco Luigi Zurlo, Majella Geraghty, Zoe Sophie Oftring
article en
1 citations

Abstract

EFSs remain underused in the EU DHT sector, primarily due to regulatory complexity, fragmentation, and a lack of tailored guidance. A harmonized, DHT-specific EFS framework featuring clearer definitions, standardized processes, and structured dialog between innovators and regulators could accelerate safe, effective, and user-centric digital health innovation. As the MDR and AI Act converge, coordinated regulatory approaches will be critical to balancing innovation, safety, and patient benefit in Europe.

Journal of Medical Internet ResearchVol. 27
Philipps University of Marburg (DE), Trinity College Dublin (IE), Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE), Hôpital Européen (FR), Trials Methodology Research Network (IE), Bocconi University (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stakeholder Perspectives on Early Feasibility Studies for Digital Health Technologies in the European Union: Qualitative Interview Study — Sebastian Kühn, Nicolas Martelli, et al. · Journal of Medical Internet Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS