Benchmarking Large Language Models for Hate Speech Detection in Arabic Dialects: Focus on the Saudi Dialects

This study investigates the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) in detecting Arabic hate speech, with a particular focus on prompt-based learning and the sociolinguistic challenges of Saudi dialects. We evaluate four LLMs, GPT-4o, LLaMA3, Gemma2, and ALLaM, using zero-shot, one-shot, and three-shot prompting strategies. The results show that all models benefit from in-context examples, with GPT-4o achieving the highest overall performance across all prompting settings. A detailed error analysis reveals persistent challenges, particularly in detecting implicit hate, handling dialectal variation, and interpreting culturally embedded expressions. We also highlight limitations related to topic bias and annotation ambiguity, which further complicate model evaluation. Overall, the findings offer key insights for evaluating LLMs in low-resource settings and addressing the unique linguistic complexities of Arabic dialects.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2025.0160978
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking Large Language Models for Hate Speech Detection in Arabic Dialects: Focus on the Saudi Dialects

Omaima Fallatah
International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

Benchmarking Large Language Models for Hate Speech Detection in Arabic Dialects: Focus on the Saudi Dialects

Omaima Fallatah
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) in detecting Arabic hate speech, with a particular focus on prompt-based learning and the sociolinguistic challenges of Saudi dialects. We evaluate four LLMs, GPT-4o, LLaMA3, Gemma2, and ALLaM, using zero-shot, one-shot, and three-shot prompting strategies. The results show that all models benefit from in-context examples, with GPT-4o achieving the highest overall performance across all prompting settings. A detailed error analysis reveals persistent challenges, particularly in detecting implicit hate, handling dialectal variation, and interpreting culturally embedded expressions. We also highlight limitations related to topic bias and annotation ambiguity, which further complicate model evaluation. Overall, the findings offer key insights for evaluating LLMs in low-resource settings and addressing the unique linguistic complexities of Arabic dialects.

International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and ApplicationsVol. 16(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Benchmarking Large Language Models for Hate Speech Detection in Arabic Dialects: Focus on the Saudi Dialects — Omaima Fallatah · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS