Assessment of Differences in Liquefaction Potential Using Standard Penetration Test and Shear-Wave Velocity Data Obtained at 10 Sites in West Tennessee

This paper compares the liquefaction potential at 10 West Tennessee sites using two sets of field test data. The liquefaction potential at each test site is estimated using Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and Shear-wave Velocity (Vs) measurements. Liquefaction Potential Index (LPI) is determined at each site, and comparisons are made between LPIs obtained using SPT and the Vs data. For most of the sites, LPIs based on Vs data are higher than the LPIs obtained using SPT N-values at the same location. The primary reasons for the differences in LPIs are the variation of empirical relationships for estimating cyclic resistance ratio (CRR), which is different between SPT and the Vs, and the impact of the weighting function of the LPI equation. CRR is mainly a function of and Vs1 values with depth for the SPT and Vs methods, respectively. The weighting function is dependent on the depth of the liquefiable layer. A comparison is made between the number and depth of liquefiable layers of SPT and Vs methods at each site. The number and depth of liquefiable layers are the primary reasons for differences in CRR and the weighting function impact; consequently, LPI.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.1.3376
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Differences in Liquefaction Potential Using Standard Penetration Test and Shear-Wave Velocity Data Obtained at 10 Sites in West Tennessee

Hamed Tohidi, Shahram Pezeshk, David Arellano
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

Assessment of Differences in Liquefaction Potential Using Standard Penetration Test and Shear-Wave Velocity Data Obtained at 10 Sites in West Tennessee

Hamed Tohidi, Shahram Pezeshk, David Arellano
article en

Abstract

This paper compares the liquefaction potential at 10 West Tennessee sites using two sets of field test data. The liquefaction potential at each test site is estimated using Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and Shear-wave Velocity (Vs) measurements. Liquefaction Potential Index (LPI) is determined at each site, and comparisons are made between LPIs obtained using SPT and the Vs data. For most of the sites, LPIs based on Vs data are higher than the LPIs obtained using SPT N-values at the same location. The primary reasons for the differences in LPIs are the variation of empirical relationships for estimating cyclic resistance ratio (CRR), which is different between SPT and the Vs, and the impact of the weighting function of the LPI equation. CRR is mainly a function of and Vs1 values with depth for the SPT and Vs methods, respectively. The weighting function is dependent on the depth of the liquefiable layer. A comparison is made between the number and depth of liquefiable layers of SPT and Vs methods at each site. The number and depth of liquefiable layers are the primary reasons for differences in CRR and the weighting function impact; consequently, LPI.

World Journal of Advanced Research and ReviewsVol. 28(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment of Differences in Liquefaction Potential Using Standard Penetration Test and Shear-Wave Velocity Data Obtained at 10 Sites in West Tennessee — Hamed Tohidi, Shahram Pezeshk, et al. · World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS