Comparative study of indoor positioning datasets focusing on localization accuracy success rate and floor classification

Indoor positioning systems (IPS) are crucial for enabling location-aware services in GPS-denied environments such as buildings, hospitals, and industrial facilities. However, the lack of standardized, high-quality datasets remains a significant barrier to the development and fair evaluation of localization algorithms. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of four widely used indoor positioning datasets-BLE Indoor, SODIndoorLoc, TUJI1, and UJIIndoorLoc-evaluating their localization accuracy, success rate, and floor classification performance. Through exploratory data analysis and systematic experimentation using an XGBoost model with consistent hyperparameters, we identify how dataset-specific characteristics such as signal sparsity, access point (AP) density, device heterogeneity, and spatial layout affect localization outcomes. Results show that while high AP density can enhance accuracy, other factors like environmental complexity, weak RSSI signals, and multi-device variability significantly influence model performance. Based on our findings, we offer practical guidelines for dataset selection, feature engineering, and design improvements to support robust and generalizable IPS development. This study provides critical insights for both researchers and practitioners aiming to advance reliable indoor localization solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17692-w
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of indoor positioning datasets focusing on localization accuracy success rate and floor classification

Zuhairiah Zainal Abidin, Naglaa F. Soliman, Abdulraqeb Alhammadi, Muhammad Asim Khan et al.
4 citations
Scientific Reports
Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
2.92
article

Comparative study of indoor positioning datasets focusing on localization accuracy success rate and floor classification

Zuhairiah Zainal Abidin, Naglaa F. Soliman, Abdulraqeb Alhammadi, Muhammad Asim Khan, Abeer D. Algarni, Ayesha Ayub
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Indoor positioning systems (IPS) are crucial for enabling location-aware services in GPS-denied environments such as buildings, hospitals, and industrial facilities. However, the lack of standardized, high-quality datasets remains a significant barrier to the development and fair evaluation of localization algorithms. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of four widely used indoor positioning datasets-BLE Indoor, SODIndoorLoc, TUJI1, and UJIIndoorLoc-evaluating their localization accuracy, success rate, and floor classification performance. Through exploratory data analysis and systematic experimentation using an XGBoost model with consistent hyperparameters, we identify how dataset-specific characteristics such as signal sparsity, access point (AP) density, device heterogeneity, and spatial layout affect localization outcomes. Results show that while high AP density can enhance accuracy, other factors like environmental complexity, weak RSSI signals, and multi-device variability significantly influence model performance. Based on our findings, we offer practical guidelines for dataset selection, feature engineering, and design improvements to support robust and generalizable IPS development. This study provides critical insights for both researchers and practitioners aiming to advance reliable indoor localization solutions.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), University of Kuala Lumpur (MY), University of Technology Malaysia (MY), Tun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia (MY)
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
2.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.