Cognitive Bias Mitigation in Executive Decision-Making: A Data-Driven Approach Integrating Big Data Analytics, AI, and Explainable Systems

Cognitive biases continue to pose significant challenges in executive decision-making, often leading to strategic inefficiencies, misallocation of resources, and flawed risk assessments. While traditional decision-making relies on intuition and experience, these methods are increasingly proving inadequate in addressing the complexity of modern business environments. Despite the growing integration of big data analytics into executive workflows, existing research lacks a comprehensive examination of how AI-driven methodologies can systematically mitigate biases while maintaining transparency and trust. This paper addresses these gaps by analyzing how big data analytics, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and explainable AI (XAI) contribute to reducing heuristic-driven errors in executive reasoning. Specifically, it explores the role of predictive modeling, real-time analytics, and decision intelligence systems in enhancing objectivity and decision accuracy. Furthermore, this study identifies key organizational and technical barriers—such as biases embedded in training data, model opacity, and resistance to AI adoption—that hinder the effectiveness of data-driven decision-making. By reviewing empirical findings from A/B testing, simulation experiments, and behavioral assessments, this research examines the applicability of AI-powered decision support systems in strategic management. The contributions of this paper include a detailed analysis of bias mitigation mechanisms, an evaluation of current limitations in AI-driven decision intelligence, and practical recommendations for fostering a more data-driven decision culture. By addressing these research gaps, this study advances the discourse on responsible AI adoption and provides actionable insights for organizations seeking to enhance executive decision-making through big data analytics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14193930
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive Bias Mitigation in Executive Decision-Making: A Data-Driven Approach Integrating Big Data Analytics, AI, and Explainable Systems

Leonidas Theodorakopoulos, Constantinos Halkiopoulos, Alexandra Theodoropoulou
3 citations
Electronics
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
7.44
article

Cognitive Bias Mitigation in Executive Decision-Making: A Data-Driven Approach Integrating Big Data Analytics, AI, and Explainable Systems

Leonidas Theodorakopoulos, Constantinos Halkiopoulos, Alexandra Theodoropoulou
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Cognitive biases continue to pose significant challenges in executive decision-making, often leading to strategic inefficiencies, misallocation of resources, and flawed risk assessments. While traditional decision-making relies on intuition and experience, these methods are increasingly proving inadequate in addressing the complexity of modern business environments. Despite the growing integration of big data analytics into executive workflows, existing research lacks a comprehensive examination of how AI-driven methodologies can systematically mitigate biases while maintaining transparency and trust. This paper addresses these gaps by analyzing how big data analytics, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and explainable AI (XAI) contribute to reducing heuristic-driven errors in executive reasoning. Specifically, it explores the role of predictive modeling, real-time analytics, and decision intelligence systems in enhancing objectivity and decision accuracy. Furthermore, this study identifies key organizational and technical barriers—such as biases embedded in training data, model opacity, and resistance to AI adoption—that hinder the effectiveness of data-driven decision-making. By reviewing empirical findings from A/B testing, simulation experiments, and behavioral assessments, this research examines the applicability of AI-powered decision support systems in strategic management. The contributions of this paper include a detailed analysis of bias mitigation mechanisms, an evaluation of current limitations in AI-driven decision intelligence, and practical recommendations for fostering a more data-driven decision culture. By addressing these research gaps, this study advances the discourse on responsible AI adoption and provides actionable insights for organizations seeking to enhance executive decision-making through big data analytics.

ElectronicsVol. 14(19)
University of Patras (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.