Political economy of renewable energy transitions: Technology-specific responses to geopolitical risk and political stability in G7 economies

The global transition to renewable energy faces increasing challenges from geopolitical uncertainties, political instabilities, and varying innovation capabilities across different technologies and countries. This study examines the heterogeneous effects of geopolitical risk, political stability, and the moderating role of technological innovation on renewable energy deployment. The study examined solar PV, onshore wind, and hydropower technologies in G-7 countries from 2000 to 2024. The study adopted Driscoll-Kraay standard errors and Panel FMOLS estimation techniques. The analysis reveals significant technology-specific vulnerabilities to external factors. Geopolitical risk substantially reduces solar PV deployment by 1.99 % and hydropower by 1.98 % per unit increase, while wind energy demonstrates resilience. Political stability proves critical only for hydropower development, requiring extensive institutional coordination. Technological innovation emerges as both a direct catalyst for solar expansion and a crucial moderating factor mitigating geopolitical risks for hydropower. These findings challenge assumptions of uniform renewable energy responses and underscore the necessity for technology-specific policy approaches rather than generalized strategies in an increasingly uncertain geopolitical landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127453
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political economy of renewable energy transitions: Technology-specific responses to geopolitical risk and political stability in G7 economies

Seth Acquah Boateng, Frank Agyemang Karikari, Michael Provide Fumey, Gabriel Mordzifa Sackitey et al.
2 citations
Journal of Environmental Management
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
6.26
article

Political economy of renewable energy transitions: Technology-specific responses to geopolitical risk and political stability in G7 economies

Seth Acquah Boateng, Frank Agyemang Karikari, Michael Provide Fumey, Gabriel Mordzifa Sackitey, Jiancheng Xi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The global transition to renewable energy faces increasing challenges from geopolitical uncertainties, political instabilities, and varying innovation capabilities across different technologies and countries. This study examines the heterogeneous effects of geopolitical risk, political stability, and the moderating role of technological innovation on renewable energy deployment. The study examined solar PV, onshore wind, and hydropower technologies in G-7 countries from 2000 to 2024. The study adopted Driscoll-Kraay standard errors and Panel FMOLS estimation techniques. The analysis reveals significant technology-specific vulnerabilities to external factors. Geopolitical risk substantially reduces solar PV deployment by 1.99 % and hydropower by 1.98 % per unit increase, while wind energy demonstrates resilience. Political stability proves critical only for hydropower development, requiring extensive institutional coordination. Technological innovation emerges as both a direct catalyst for solar expansion and a crucial moderating factor mitigating geopolitical risks for hydropower. These findings challenge assumptions of uniform renewable energy responses and underscore the necessity for technology-specific policy approaches rather than generalized strategies in an increasingly uncertain geopolitical landscape.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 394
Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN), Northwestern Polytechnic University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.