Producing and processing word combinations in an L2: An eye-tracking study exploring the individual learner experience

Integration between production data and processing data has generally been based on the combination between corpus-based measures and psycholinguistic experiments. The main limitation of this approach is that the sample of participants providing these two kinds of data will be different, thus entailing the impossibility of investigating how production and processing are related at the level of the individual. This is particularly true when it comes to a key component in second language development such as word combinations, which has attracted attention in both corpus linguistics and psycholinguistics, without ever addressing the individual learner experience. To tap into this area, we conducted a preliminary study by eliciting written texts from a group of learners of Italian as a second language (L2), identified a set of correct verb + noun (object) combinations in each text, performed lexical and grammatical manipulations and built individualised eye-tracking experiments for each of the same participants. We found that originally produced verb + noun (object) combinations are processed faster than manipulated combinations, that lexical manipulation affects processing more than grammatical manipulation and that a higher strength of association between the components of the combination determines a processing advantage in learners with an advanced level of proficiency. Theoretical and methodological implications for the analysis of production and processing in an L2 are discussed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the European Second Language Association
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.144
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Producing and processing word combinations in an L2: An eye-tracking study exploring the individual learner experience

Veronica D’Alesio, Irene Fioravanti, Maria Roccaforte, Stefania Spina et al.
Journal of the European Second Language Association
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
article

Producing and processing word combinations in an L2: An eye-tracking study exploring the individual learner experience

Veronica D’Alesio, Irene Fioravanti, Maria Roccaforte, Stefania Spina, Luciana Forti
article en

Abstract

Integration between production data and processing data has generally been based on the combination between corpus-based measures and psycholinguistic experiments. The main limitation of this approach is that the sample of participants providing these two kinds of data will be different, thus entailing the impossibility of investigating how production and processing are related at the level of the individual. This is particularly true when it comes to a key component in second language development such as word combinations, which has attracted attention in both corpus linguistics and psycholinguistics, without ever addressing the individual learner experience. To tap into this area, we conducted a preliminary study by eliciting written texts from a group of learners of Italian as a second language (L2), identified a set of correct verb + noun (object) combinations in each text, performed lexical and grammatical manipulations and built individualised eye-tracking experiments for each of the same participants. We found that originally produced verb + noun (object) combinations are processed faster than manipulated combinations, that lexical manipulation affects processing more than grammatical manipulation and that a higher strength of association between the components of the combination determines a processing advantage in learners with an advanced level of proficiency. Theoretical and methodological implications for the analysis of production and processing in an L2 are discussed.

Journal of the European Second Language AssociationVol. 9(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.