Guide to dynamic OCT data analysis

Dynamic optical coherence tomography (DOCT) enhances conventional OCT by providing specific information related to flow dynamics, cell motility, and organelle metabolic activity. These biological phenomena can be detected with varying sensitivity depending on the OCT architecture parameters, including wavelength, numerical aperture, and implementation method (time domain or Fourier domain). Despite its potential, the field lacks standardization as various research groups have independently developed algorithms for specific applications. In this paper, we compare four widely used DOCT algorithms, each employing a distinct analytical approach: power spectral density moment analysis, frequency band visualization, logarithmic intensity variation evaluation, and motility-based analysis. These algorithms were originally optimized for different OCT technologies (full-field OCT, microscopic OCT, swept-source OCT, and spectral domain OCT), which vary in temporal and spatial resolution as well as susceptibility to motion artifacts. To conduct a fair evaluation, we perform comprehensive cross-wise comparisons using datasets acquired from each of these setups. Our findings reveal that each method exhibits unique advantages in specific imaging environments, thereby providing valuable guidance for algorithm selection based on particular application requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Optics Express
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.571394
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Optical Coherence Tomography Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guide to dynamic OCT data analysis

Rion Morishita, Yoshiaki Yasuno, Olivier Thouvenin, Peter König et al.
4 citations
Biomedical Optics Express
Optical Coherence Tomography Applications
2.70
article

Guide to dynamic OCT data analysis

Rion Morishita, Yoshiaki Yasuno, Olivier Thouvenin, Peter König, Noah Heldt, Tual Monfort, Robert Schönherr, Kate Grieve, Gereon Hüttmann, Ibrahim Abd El-Sadek
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Dynamic optical coherence tomography (DOCT) enhances conventional OCT by providing specific information related to flow dynamics, cell motility, and organelle metabolic activity. These biological phenomena can be detected with varying sensitivity depending on the OCT architecture parameters, including wavelength, numerical aperture, and implementation method (time domain or Fourier domain). Despite its potential, the field lacks standardization as various research groups have independently developed algorithms for specific applications. In this paper, we compare four widely used DOCT algorithms, each employing a distinct analytical approach: power spectral density moment analysis, frequency band visualization, logarithmic intensity variation evaluation, and motility-based analysis. These algorithms were originally optimized for different OCT technologies (full-field OCT, microscopic OCT, swept-source OCT, and spectral domain OCT), which vary in temporal and spatial resolution as well as susceptibility to motion artifacts. To conduct a fair evaluation, we perform comprehensive cross-wise comparisons using datasets acquired from each of these setups. Our findings reveal that each method exhibits unique advantages in specific imaging environments, thereby providing valuable guidance for algorithm selection based on particular application requirements.

Biomedical Optics ExpressVol. 16(11)
Damietta University (EG), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut de la Vision (FR), University of Tsukuba (JP), Inserm (FR), Tsukuba University of Technology (JP), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Institut Langevin (FR), German Center for Lung Research (DE), University of Lübeck (DE), ESPCI Paris (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Optical Coherence Tomography Applications
2.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.