Stage-dependent cerebrocerebellar communication during sensorimotor processing

Cerebral cortex and cerebellum are essential for sensorimotor control, but the dynamics of their interactions remain unclear. Here, we investigated which pathways prevail during preparation and execution of spontaneous whisker movements in mice. During preparation, neuronal activity of primary motor (M1) and somatosensory (S1) cortex precede that of cerebellar crus regions, with a lead that is consistent with relaying a copy of motor commands. After movement onset, the phase of the signal inverts, indicating a dominant vector signaling from cerebellum to cerebrum. At this stage, Purkinje cell activity correlates more with S1 than M1, generating a prediction of sensory consequences during motor actions. A computational cerebello-cortical model could replicate the changes in dynamics and directionality. Optogenetic manipulations of pons and thalamus confirm the modeled predictions on stage-dependent dynamics. Together our data point towards a swap in direction of information flow between cerebrum and cerebellum when motor preparation switches to execution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64592-8
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Neural dynamics and brain function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stage-dependent cerebrocerebellar communication during sensorimotor processing

Vincenzo Romano, Staf Bauer, Jorge F. Mejías, Chris I. De Zeeuw et al.
3 citations
Nature Communications
Neural dynamics and brain function
4.29
article

Stage-dependent cerebrocerebellar communication during sensorimotor processing

Vincenzo Romano, Staf Bauer, Jorge F. Mejías, Chris I. De Zeeuw, Nathalie van Wingerden, Matthijs van Driessche, Brendan Boeser
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Cerebral cortex and cerebellum are essential for sensorimotor control, but the dynamics of their interactions remain unclear. Here, we investigated which pathways prevail during preparation and execution of spontaneous whisker movements in mice. During preparation, neuronal activity of primary motor (M1) and somatosensory (S1) cortex precede that of cerebellar crus regions, with a lead that is consistent with relaying a copy of motor commands. After movement onset, the phase of the signal inverts, indicating a dominant vector signaling from cerebellum to cerebrum. At this stage, Purkinje cell activity correlates more with S1 than M1, generating a prediction of sensory consequences during motor actions. A computational cerebello-cortical model could replicate the changes in dynamics and directionality. Optogenetic manipulations of pons and thalamus confirm the modeled predictions on stage-dependent dynamics. Together our data point towards a swap in direction of information flow between cerebrum and cerebellum when motor preparation switches to execution.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL), Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Neural dynamics and brain function
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stage-dependent cerebrocerebellar communication during sensorimotor processing — Vincenzo Romano, Staf Bauer, et al. · Nature Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS