Mixed Management in Growing and Finishing Pigs: Impacts on Social Behavior and Judgment Bias

Intensive pig production practices may shape cognition and behavior. We evaluated whether repeated regrouping (mixing) and gender (gilts vs. barrows) affect social interactions, fear-related responses, and affective state. A total of 96 growing pigs were separated into two treatments: control-pigs that were mixed once during the growing-finishing period; and social stress-pigs that were mixed thrice during the growing-finishing period. Social and non-social behaviors were directly noted, and four behavioral tests were conducted: open field, novel object, couples, and judgment bias tests. The statistical analysis compared gender and treatment, and <i>p</i>-values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. Females stayed longer in the test pen entrance area during the novel object test and barrows spent more time at the feeder and defecated more during the couples' test. With regard to the judgment bias test, females took longer to be considered trained in the discriminatory learning task and presented a "pessimistic judgment" during the ambiguous cue. Our results suggest that gender influences judgment bias in pigs and can influence social and non-social behavior, which may reflect a negative affective state with implications for their welfare and management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15192893
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixed Management in Growing and Finishing Pigs: Impacts on Social Behavior and Judgment Bias

Angela Cristina da Fonseca de Oliveira, Leandro Batista Costa, Antoni Dalmau, H. Wéber
Animals
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
article

Mixed Management in Growing and Finishing Pigs: Impacts on Social Behavior and Judgment Bias

Angela Cristina da Fonseca de Oliveira, Leandro Batista Costa, Antoni Dalmau, H. Wéber
article en

Abstract

Intensive pig production practices may shape cognition and behavior. We evaluated whether repeated regrouping (mixing) and gender (gilts vs. barrows) affect social interactions, fear-related responses, and affective state. A total of 96 growing pigs were separated into two treatments: control-pigs that were mixed once during the growing-finishing period; and social stress-pigs that were mixed thrice during the growing-finishing period. Social and non-social behaviors were directly noted, and four behavioral tests were conducted: open field, novel object, couples, and judgment bias tests. The statistical analysis compared gender and treatment, and <i>p</i>-values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. Females stayed longer in the test pen entrance area during the novel object test and barrows spent more time at the feeder and defecated more during the couples' test. With regard to the judgment bias test, females took longer to be considered trained in the discriminatory learning task and presented a "pessimistic judgment" during the ambiguous cue. Our results suggest that gender influences judgment bias in pigs and can influence social and non-social behavior, which may reflect a negative affective state with implications for their welfare and management.

AnimalsVol. 15(19)
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (BR), Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (ES)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.