Molecular Polariton Dynamics in Realistic Cavities
The large number of degrees of freedom involved in polaritonic chemistry processes considerably restricts the systems that can be described by any ab initio approach, due to the resulting high computational cost. Semiclassical methods that treat light classically offer a promising route for overcoming these limitations. In this work, we present a new implementation that combines the numerical propagation of Maxwell's equations to simulate realistic cavities with quantum electron dynamics at the density functional tight-binding (DFTB) theory level. This implementation allows for the simulation of a large number of molecules described at the atomistic level, interacting with cavity modes obtained by numerically solving Maxwell's equations. By mimicking experimental setups, our approach enables the calculation of transmission spectra, in which we observe the corresponding polaritonic signals. In addition, we have access to local information, revealing complex responses of individual molecules that depend on the number, geometry, position, and orientation of the molecules inside the cavity.
Authors
- Michael Ruggenthaler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0728-8372)
- Maxim Sukharev (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1975-8482)
- Abraham Nitzan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8431-0967)
- Carlos M. Bustamante (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6289-0112)
- Franco P. Bonafé (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-6776)
- Ángel Rubio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2060-3151)
Institutions
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- California University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Center for Free-Electron Laser Science (DE)
- Max Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter (DE)
- Arizona State University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Published
- 2025-10-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01318
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Strong Light-Matter Interactions
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.49