Validation of the State Self-Compassion Scale in a German Sample and its Relations to Psychological Well-being and Mental Health

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to translate and validate the State Self-Compassion Scale in its long (SSCS-L, 18 items) and short form (SSCS-S, 6 items) for German-speaking samples and to investigate its associations with psychological well-being and mental health. Method An online sample ( n = 1,436) completed the translated SSCS-L and other psychological state and trait measures. Factor structures were examined using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM). Associations between subscales of SSCS-L and other constructs were investigated using partial correlational network models. Results A 6-factor ESEM based on 16 items showed the best fit for the SSCS-L; a global self-compassion factor—and thus using a total score—was not supported. Subscales self-kindness and self-judgment showed acceptable to good internal consistency, all others only marginally acceptable or fair internal consistency. With the SSCS-S, a 2-factor ESEM fits best, representing positive compassionate and negative non-compassionate self-responding. The network model showed positive unique links between positive subscales of SSCS-L and predictors and indicators of well-being; and negative unique links between negative subscales and these indicators. Negative subscales of SSCS-L were positively related to mental distress, while positive subscales showed inverse associations. Conclusions We present the 16-item SSCS-L and 6-item SSCS-S as useful tools for assessing state self-compassion as a multidimensional construct in research and interventions. We recommend using the SSCS-L with its six and the SSCS-S with its two subscales, and advise researchers to check factor structure and reliability in their samples due to potential variability across contexts. Preregistration The study was preregistered in PsychArchives ( https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.6665 ), with deviations reported in the Online Resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mindfulness
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-025-02669-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the State Self-Compassion Scale in a German Sample and its Relations to Psychological Well-being and Mental Health

Anne Möhring, Anja S. Göritz, Sarah Katharina Schäfer, Michèle Wessa et al.
1 citations
Mindfulness
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
2.31
article

Validation of the State Self-Compassion Scale in a German Sample and its Relations to Psychological Well-being and Mental Health

Anne Möhring, Anja S. Göritz, Sarah Katharina Schäfer, Michèle Wessa, Oliver Tuescher, Lisa von Boros, Klaus Lieb
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to translate and validate the State Self-Compassion Scale in its long (SSCS-L, 18 items) and short form (SSCS-S, 6 items) for German-speaking samples and to investigate its associations with psychological well-being and mental health. Method An online sample ( n = 1,436) completed the translated SSCS-L and other psychological state and trait measures. Factor structures were examined using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM). Associations between subscales of SSCS-L and other constructs were investigated using partial correlational network models. Results A 6-factor ESEM based on 16 items showed the best fit for the SSCS-L; a global self-compassion factor—and thus using a total score—was not supported. Subscales self-kindness and self-judgment showed acceptable to good internal consistency, all others only marginally acceptable or fair internal consistency. With the SSCS-S, a 2-factor ESEM fits best, representing positive compassionate and negative non-compassionate self-responding. The network model showed positive unique links between positive subscales of SSCS-L and predictors and indicators of well-being; and negative unique links between negative subscales and these indicators. Negative subscales of SSCS-L were positively related to mental distress, while positive subscales showed inverse associations. Conclusions We present the 16-item SSCS-L and 6-item SSCS-S as useful tools for assessing state self-compassion as a multidimensional construct in research and interventions. We recommend using the SSCS-L with its six and the SSCS-S with its two subscales, and advise researchers to check factor structure and reliability in their samples due to potential variability across contexts. Preregistration The study was preregistered in PsychArchives ( https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.6665 ), with deviations reported in the Online Resources.

MindfulnessVol. 16(10)
University of Augsburg (DE), German Cancer Research Center (DE), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE), Luther University (KR), Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Central Institute of Mental Health (DE), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.