Hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment: an analysis of Brazil’s far-right media

This article examines how Brazilian far-right media framed hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as part of a COVID-19 preventive protocol, referred to as “early treatment.” Brazilian partisan outlets extensively endorsed HCQ’s scientific soundness, helping to legitimize Bolsonaro’s pandemic response. By pushing HCQ, the Brazilian Federal Government downplayed social distancing, aligning itself with herd immunity strategies. A Correspondence Factorial Analysis (CFA) of the most influential partisan outlets extracted three major framings present in the media materials: “Scientific Evidence,” “Personal Experience,” and “Freedom to Medicate.” A subsequent Content Analysis found twenty-six scientific claims regarding the HCQ protocol. Far-right media in Brazil have framed unproven substances for COVID-19, regardless of compelling evidence of their ineffectiveness. Brazil’s case shows the need for a deeper understanding of how partisan vehicles frame contemporary social problems as they legitimize policies contrary to scientific consensus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication & Society
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15581/003.38.2.019
Primary Topic
Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment: an analysis of Brazil’s far-right media

Felipe Dos-Reis-Campos, João Marcos Mott Pavanelli, Gabriela Marques Di Giulio, Marko Monteiro
Communication & Society
Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
article

Hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment: an analysis of Brazil’s far-right media

Felipe Dos-Reis-Campos, João Marcos Mott Pavanelli, Gabriela Marques Di Giulio, Marko Monteiro
article en

Abstract

This article examines how Brazilian far-right media framed hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as part of a COVID-19 preventive protocol, referred to as “early treatment.” Brazilian partisan outlets extensively endorsed HCQ’s scientific soundness, helping to legitimize Bolsonaro’s pandemic response. By pushing HCQ, the Brazilian Federal Government downplayed social distancing, aligning itself with herd immunity strategies. A Correspondence Factorial Analysis (CFA) of the most influential partisan outlets extracted three major framings present in the media materials: “Scientific Evidence,” “Personal Experience,” and “Freedom to Medicate.” A subsequent Content Analysis found twenty-six scientific claims regarding the HCQ protocol. Far-right media in Brazil have framed unproven substances for COVID-19, regardless of compelling evidence of their ineffectiveness. Brazil’s case shows the need for a deeper understanding of how partisan vehicles frame contemporary social problems as they legitimize policies contrary to scientific consensus.

Communication & SocietyVol. 38(2)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Universidade Federal de Alagoas (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.