Social radicalisms and their critiques

The paper seeks to determine the content and scope of the operational use of the concept of social radicalism. The introductory sections of the paper are dedicated to a linguistic analysis of the term itself and the historical contexts in which it was used. The central part of the paper is occupied, first, by a presentation of two classical or proto-radicalisms (Joseph de Maistre and Karl Marx), followed by two typical critiques of radicalism (Helmut Plessner and Karl Popper). Considering the various understandings of radicalism presented, the concluding section highlights the advisability of speaking about it in the plural, as well as the possibility of a so-called radical critique of radicalism, which would not end with warnings about its potentially disastrous revolutionary consequences but would dismantle the fascination with the root (radix) underlying the discursive figure it practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociologija
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2298/soc2503449k
Primary Topic
Religion, Society, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social radicalisms and their critiques

Predrag Krstić
Sociologija
Religion, Society, and Development
article

Social radicalisms and their critiques

Predrag Krstić
article en

Abstract

The paper seeks to determine the content and scope of the operational use of the concept of social radicalism. The introductory sections of the paper are dedicated to a linguistic analysis of the term itself and the historical contexts in which it was used. The central part of the paper is occupied, first, by a presentation of two classical or proto-radicalisms (Joseph de Maistre and Karl Marx), followed by two typical critiques of radicalism (Helmut Plessner and Karl Popper). Considering the various understandings of radicalism presented, the concluding section highlights the advisability of speaking about it in the plural, as well as the possibility of a so-called radical critique of radicalism, which would not end with warnings about its potentially disastrous revolutionary consequences but would dismantle the fascination with the root (radix) underlying the discursive figure it practices.

SociologijaVol. 67(3)
Institut za filozofiju (HR), Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Religion, Society, and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.