Comparative Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of Different Glaucoma Treatment Regimens

To explore the treatment outcomes and related differences among different types of glaucoma. The research selected 45 primary open-angle glaucoma patients (Group A), 45 primary angle-closure glaucoma patients (Group B), and 46 secondary glaucoma patients (Group C) as subjects, and all these patients underwent trabeculectomy. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated based on five aspects: the degree of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, the rate of visual field loss progression, changes in optic nerve fiber layer thickness, the incidence of postoperative complications, and patient quality of life scores. Data were processed using statistical methods such as one-way ANOVA. Overall comparisons of IOP reduction, visual field loss progression rate, optic nerve fiber layer thickness changes, and postoperative complication incidence among the three groups showed P values all less than 0.001, which indicates significant statistical differences. Two-tailed comparisons within the groups revealed that Group B had a significantly higher degree of IOP reduction than Groups A and C, while Group C had a higher degree than Group A. Additionally, Group B showed a significantly faster rate of visual field loss progression and thinner optic nerve fiber layers compared to Groups A and C, with Group C having a faster progression rate than Group A. Group B also had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative complications than Groups A and C. Group C had a higher incidence than Group A. In terms of quality of life scores, comparisons of total NEI-VFQ scores, as well as scores in the visual function, psychological state, and social activity participation dimensions, among the three groups showed P values all less than 0.001; Group B had the lowest scores, and Group A had the highest. There are significant differences in treatment outcomes and quality of life among different types of glaucoma, with primary angle-closure glaucoma being more severe and having a poorer prognosis. Clinically, personalized treatment plans should be developed based on the characteristics of different types of glaucoma.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Case Reports
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.acr.1001163
Primary Topic
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of Different Glaucoma Treatment Regimens

Wenbin Zheng, Su Yang, Xin Tong, Zheng Qingyuan et al.
Archives of Case Reports
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
article

Comparative Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of Different Glaucoma Treatment Regimens

Wenbin Zheng, Su Yang, Xin Tong, Zheng Qingyuan, Zhong Dayong
article en

Abstract

To explore the treatment outcomes and related differences among different types of glaucoma. The research selected 45 primary open-angle glaucoma patients (Group A), 45 primary angle-closure glaucoma patients (Group B), and 46 secondary glaucoma patients (Group C) as subjects, and all these patients underwent trabeculectomy. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated based on five aspects: the degree of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, the rate of visual field loss progression, changes in optic nerve fiber layer thickness, the incidence of postoperative complications, and patient quality of life scores. Data were processed using statistical methods such as one-way ANOVA. Overall comparisons of IOP reduction, visual field loss progression rate, optic nerve fiber layer thickness changes, and postoperative complication incidence among the three groups showed P values all less than 0.001, which indicates significant statistical differences. Two-tailed comparisons within the groups revealed that Group B had a significantly higher degree of IOP reduction than Groups A and C, while Group C had a higher degree than Group A. Additionally, Group B showed a significantly faster rate of visual field loss progression and thinner optic nerve fiber layers compared to Groups A and C, with Group C having a faster progression rate than Group A. Group B also had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative complications than Groups A and C. Group C had a higher incidence than Group A. In terms of quality of life scores, comparisons of total NEI-VFQ scores, as well as scores in the visual function, psychological state, and social activity participation dimensions, among the three groups showed P values all less than 0.001; Group B had the lowest scores, and Group A had the highest. There are significant differences in treatment outcomes and quality of life among different types of glaucoma, with primary angle-closure glaucoma being more severe and having a poorer prognosis. Clinically, personalized treatment plans should be developed based on the characteristics of different types of glaucoma.

Archives of Case ReportsVol. 9(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.