Status Republiki Chińskiej na Tajwanie w świetle prawa międzynarodowego

The legal status of the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan remains a complex issue in international law. This article examines the ROC’s statehood criteria under the Montevideo Convention, addressing Taiwan’s population, territory, governance, and capacity for foreign relations. Taiwan exhibits features of statehood, including a permanent population, a defined territory, and an effective government. However, its international recognition is limited, with only 12 states acknowledging the ROC as of 2025. Taiwan’s legal status is further complicated by historical treaties, such as the Treaty of San Francisco, which left Taiwan’s sovereignty unresolved, and the United Nations Resolution 2758, recognizing the People’s Republic of China as the sole representative of China. While Taiwan operates as a de facto regime with distinct administrative functions and significant international influence, particularly in technology and East Asian security, it has not declared independence from China. Legal scholars debate Taiwan’s position, with opinions ranging from a sui generis entity to a non-sovereign legal personality. This ambiguous status underscores the intricate interplay between international law and politics. The article concludes that while Taiwan fulfills many elements of statehood, its lack of broad recognition and self-declaration of independence preclude it from being classified as a state under international law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Orientalne
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15804/so2025301
Primary Topic
European Politics and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Status Republiki Chińskiej na Tajwanie w świetle prawa międzynarodowego

Albert Chepil
Studia Orientalne
European Politics and Security
article

Status Republiki Chińskiej na Tajwanie w świetle prawa międzynarodowego

Albert Chepil
article en

Abstract

The legal status of the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan remains a complex issue in international law. This article examines the ROC’s statehood criteria under the Montevideo Convention, addressing Taiwan’s population, territory, governance, and capacity for foreign relations. Taiwan exhibits features of statehood, including a permanent population, a defined territory, and an effective government. However, its international recognition is limited, with only 12 states acknowledging the ROC as of 2025. Taiwan’s legal status is further complicated by historical treaties, such as the Treaty of San Francisco, which left Taiwan’s sovereignty unresolved, and the United Nations Resolution 2758, recognizing the People’s Republic of China as the sole representative of China. While Taiwan operates as a de facto regime with distinct administrative functions and significant international influence, particularly in technology and East Asian security, it has not declared independence from China. Legal scholars debate Taiwan’s position, with opinions ranging from a sui generis entity to a non-sovereign legal personality. This ambiguous status underscores the intricate interplay between international law and politics. The article concludes that while Taiwan fulfills many elements of statehood, its lack of broad recognition and self-declaration of independence preclude it from being classified as a state under international law.

Studia OrientalneVol. 2025(Nr 3(35))
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
European Politics and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.