EPIC and NISTAR radiometric stability assessment using ERA5 reanalysis data

A technique to determine the radiometric stability of the Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology Advanced Radiometer (NISTAR), the two Earth-viewing instruments operating aboard the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) satellite, which is orbiting the Sun at the Lagrange-1 point, L 1 , approximately 1.5 million kilometers away from Earth, has been developed and applied. Apart from the satellite’s own measurements, it only uses output from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) atmospheric reanalysis of the global climate data center (ERA5). This method can be applied to all channels (and not just a subset) and can be repeated periodically to track the instruments’ stability. The method includes the removal of climatological diurnal and seasonal cycles, a multivariate regression fitting with selected ERA5 model output parameters, and referencing the data to the EPIC 551-nm channel, which has been determined to show no drift over the entire mission lifetime together with the NISTAR photodiode channel (200–1,100 nm). The obtained sensitivity changes were very small, ranging from a maximum total degradation of 3% over 10 years in the short UV (<340 nm) to no detectable changes for some channels. For the EPIC UV channels, the derived results were confirmed through a comparison of the EPIC data with radiances from the Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS). We attribute this excellent instrument performance mostly to the L 1 orbit, which is not only an ideal location for Earth observation, but is also extremely beneficial (quiet) with respect to instrument performance. At L 1, there are only minor temperature variations and much smaller exposure to charged particles from the Sun compared to satellites orbiting the Earth, which are fully or partly inside the Earth’s radiation belts. In this sense, L 1 can be considered “observational and instrumental heaven.” The technique described here could only be applied because DSCOVR has two different instruments (EPIC and NISTAR) observing the same Earth flux input. This suggests that it is extremely useful (maybe even essential) to combine imaging instruments (like EPIC) with integrating instruments (like NISTAR) in remote sensing applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Remote Sensing
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2025.1646764
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Calibration and Measurement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EPIC and NISTAR radiometric stability assessment using ERA5 reanalysis data

Steven R. Lorentz, Alexander L. Marshak, Alexander Cede, Rukkumani Rajagopalan et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Remote Sensing
Calibration and Measurement Techniques
4.99
article

EPIC and NISTAR radiometric stability assessment using ERA5 reanalysis data

Steven R. Lorentz, Alexander L. Marshak, Alexander Cede, Rukkumani Rajagopalan, J. R. Herman, Liang‐Kang Huang, Yinan Yu, A. W. Smith, Karin Blank
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A technique to determine the radiometric stability of the Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology Advanced Radiometer (NISTAR), the two Earth-viewing instruments operating aboard the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) satellite, which is orbiting the Sun at the Lagrange-1 point, L 1 , approximately 1.5 million kilometers away from Earth, has been developed and applied. Apart from the satellite’s own measurements, it only uses output from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) atmospheric reanalysis of the global climate data center (ERA5). This method can be applied to all channels (and not just a subset) and can be repeated periodically to track the instruments’ stability. The method includes the removal of climatological diurnal and seasonal cycles, a multivariate regression fitting with selected ERA5 model output parameters, and referencing the data to the EPIC 551-nm channel, which has been determined to show no drift over the entire mission lifetime together with the NISTAR photodiode channel (200–1,100 nm). The obtained sensitivity changes were very small, ranging from a maximum total degradation of 3% over 10 years in the short UV (<340 nm) to no detectable changes for some channels. For the EPIC UV channels, the derived results were confirmed through a comparison of the EPIC data with radiances from the Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS). We attribute this excellent instrument performance mostly to the L 1 orbit, which is not only an ideal location for Earth observation, but is also extremely beneficial (quiet) with respect to instrument performance. At L 1, there are only minor temperature variations and much smaller exposure to charged particles from the Sun compared to satellites orbiting the Earth, which are fully or partly inside the Earth’s radiation belts. In this sense, L 1 can be considered “observational and instrumental heaven.” The technique described here could only be applied because DSCOVR has two different instruments (EPIC and NISTAR) observing the same Earth flux input. This suggests that it is extremely useful (maybe even essential) to combine imaging instruments (like EPIC) with integrating instruments (like NISTAR) in remote sensing applications.

Frontiers in Remote SensingVol. 6
Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Sterling Research Group (US), SciGlob (United States) (US), Alpine Quantum Technologies (Austria) (AT), Systems Technology (United States) (US), Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center (US), Science Systems and Applications (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Calibration and Measurement Techniques
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.