Artifact management methodologies for arterial blood pressure signals: A systematic scoping review of human and animal literature

Arterial blood pressure (ABP) is a broadly measured vital signal used to monitor cardiovascular health through raw signal and derived metrics. Artifacts are a pervasive issue, resulting in a declined utility of the signal. The aim of this review was to examine the existing literature pertinent to artifact management strategies in ABP signals. A search of five databases was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The search question examined existing algorithms for artifact management in ABP signals. The initial search yielded 15,564 articles (update included 1967 additional). The review included 73 articles. Categories included: (1) artifact management in low-frequency signals, (2) artifact management in full-waveform signals, (3) identification of valid or fiducial points. There were several algorithms that achieved strong effectiveness results. However, there was poor algorithm generalizability and inter-comparability due to insufficient population size, diversity in recording methodologies, and external validation. This made it difficult to quantitatively elucidate a leading method. Real-time utility was also not mentioned, critical for clinical use. This work provides novel insights into the literature regarding artifact management in ABP, identifying shortcomings and ways in which a more generalizable solution can be identified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiological Reports
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70533
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artifact management methodologies for arterial blood pressure signals: A systematic scoping review of human and animal literature

J. W. Moon, Logan Froese, Kevin Y. Stein, Rakibul Hasan et al.
Physiological Reports
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Artifact management methodologies for arterial blood pressure signals: A systematic scoping review of human and animal literature

J. W. Moon, Logan Froese, Kevin Y. Stein, Rakibul Hasan, Frederick Adam Zeiler, Amanjyot Singh Sainbhi, Nuray Vakitbilir, Mansoor Hayat, Tobias J. G. Bergmann, Noah Silvaggio, Xue Nemoga‐Stout
article en

Abstract

Arterial blood pressure (ABP) is a broadly measured vital signal used to monitor cardiovascular health through raw signal and derived metrics. Artifacts are a pervasive issue, resulting in a declined utility of the signal. The aim of this review was to examine the existing literature pertinent to artifact management strategies in ABP signals. A search of five databases was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The search question examined existing algorithms for artifact management in ABP signals. The initial search yielded 15,564 articles (update included 1967 additional). The review included 73 articles. Categories included: (1) artifact management in low-frequency signals, (2) artifact management in full-waveform signals, (3) identification of valid or fiducial points. There were several algorithms that achieved strong effectiveness results. However, there was poor algorithm generalizability and inter-comparability due to insufficient population size, diversity in recording methodologies, and external validation. This made it difficult to quantitatively elucidate a leading method. Real-time utility was also not mentioned, critical for clinical use. This work provides novel insights into the literature regarding artifact management in ABP, identifying shortcomings and ways in which a more generalizable solution can be identified.

Physiological ReportsVol. 13(19)
Manitoba Health (CA), University of Cambridge (GB), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Pan Am Clinic (CA), Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB), University of Manitoba (CA)
Health Sciences Centre Foundation, Research Manitoba, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.