NARRATIVES OF POWER AND LEGITIMACY: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF LEADERSHIP RHETORIC IN THE 2025 PAK-INDIA CONFLICT

The study accounts for the discourses employed by Pakistan's Director General of Inter-Services Public Relations (DG-ISPR) Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and U.S. President Donald Trump during the India-Pakistan conflict of 2025. Based on Teun A. van Dijk's socio-cognitive model, this analysis explores the construction of narratives that served to justify the leaders' own actions, delegitimize the actions of the opposing parties, and influence public perception. Ultimately, it shows how the various actors strategically manipulated language to construct national identities, vindicate military action, and shape geopolitical agency. Future research may be devoted to the question of discourses of DG-ISPR, Modi, and U.S. leadership through time especially in the post-conflict narratives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT)
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63878/jalt1301
Primary Topic
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NARRATIVES OF POWER AND LEGITIMACY: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF LEADERSHIP RHETORIC IN THE 2025 PAK-INDIA CONFLICT

Saima Jamshaid, Hafiz Qasim Tarar
Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT)
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
article

NARRATIVES OF POWER AND LEGITIMACY: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF LEADERSHIP RHETORIC IN THE 2025 PAK-INDIA CONFLICT

Saima Jamshaid, Hafiz Qasim Tarar
article en

Abstract

The study accounts for the discourses employed by Pakistan's Director General of Inter-Services Public Relations (DG-ISPR) Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and U.S. President Donald Trump during the India-Pakistan conflict of 2025. Based on Teun A. van Dijk's socio-cognitive model, this analysis explores the construction of narratives that served to justify the leaders' own actions, delegitimize the actions of the opposing parties, and influence public perception. Ultimately, it shows how the various actors strategically manipulated language to construct national identities, vindicate military action, and shape geopolitical agency. Future research may be devoted to the question of discourses of DG-ISPR, Modi, and U.S. leadership through time especially in the post-conflict narratives.

Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT)Vol. 8(4)
University of Gujrat (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.