Phylogeny and Climate Jointly Modulate Forest Growth Resistance in Response to Extreme Droughts in Arid Regions

ABSTRACT Aim Repeated droughts have proven more harmful to forest growth than single extreme droughts. However, the impacts of drought durations on global forests and their underlying drivers remain poorly understood. The drought responses can be evaluated by drought sensitivity (resistance, R t ) and the post‐drought recovery rate (resilience, R s ). Differing drought responses are attributed to the different evolutionary strategies of species, which are shaped by their distinct physiological traits. Given the spatial variability in climate warming rates and aridification, understanding how trees respond to droughts of different characteristics (duration, recurrence, severity) in forested biomes is crucial to forecast productivity trends. Location Global. Time Period 1950–2020. Major Taxa Studied Tree species. Methods By explicitly considering different drought durations (single‐year and multi‐year extreme droughts), we assessed drought impacts on the growth of global forests. In addition, the roles played by environmental conditions (climate, soils), stand attributes (age, density), functional traits (wood density, leaf and hydraulic traits), and phylogeny in forest responses to drought were also considered. We used three tree‐ring databases (global ITRDB, European GenTree, and tropical data) accounting for 4374 site chronologies during the period 1950–2020, and quantified patterns in tree responses to drought in different climatic regions and biomes, including tropical forests. Results In general, significantly higher R t and R s were observed in humid regions. Interestingly, while multi‐year extreme droughts caused worse impacts than single extreme droughts on R s , they did not affect R t among drought events. Specifically, R t in arid regions was phylogenetically conserved and largely depended on wood density (WD) and hydraulic safety margin (HSM), while in humid regions, it was closely linked to climate, SLA, and HSM. Main Conclusions These findings provide new insights on the forest responses to different types of droughts, emphasising an ecological and evolutionary framework of jointly considering environmental conditions, phylogeny, and functional traits in predicting growth resilience to guide management under more arid conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70129
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phylogeny and Climate Jointly Modulate Forest Growth Resistance in Response to Extreme Droughts in Arid Regions

Jitang Li, J. Julio Camarero, Zehao Shen, Antonio Gazol et al.
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Phylogeny and Climate Jointly Modulate Forest Growth Resistance in Response to Extreme Droughts in Arid Regions

Jitang Li, J. Julio Camarero, Zehao Shen, Antonio Gazol, Eryuan Liang, Xuejing Wang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim Repeated droughts have proven more harmful to forest growth than single extreme droughts. However, the impacts of drought durations on global forests and their underlying drivers remain poorly understood. The drought responses can be evaluated by drought sensitivity (resistance, R t ) and the post‐drought recovery rate (resilience, R s ). Differing drought responses are attributed to the different evolutionary strategies of species, which are shaped by their distinct physiological traits. Given the spatial variability in climate warming rates and aridification, understanding how trees respond to droughts of different characteristics (duration, recurrence, severity) in forested biomes is crucial to forecast productivity trends. Location Global. Time Period 1950–2020. Major Taxa Studied Tree species. Methods By explicitly considering different drought durations (single‐year and multi‐year extreme droughts), we assessed drought impacts on the growth of global forests. In addition, the roles played by environmental conditions (climate, soils), stand attributes (age, density), functional traits (wood density, leaf and hydraulic traits), and phylogeny in forest responses to drought were also considered. We used three tree‐ring databases (global ITRDB, European GenTree, and tropical data) accounting for 4374 site chronologies during the period 1950–2020, and quantified patterns in tree responses to drought in different climatic regions and biomes, including tropical forests. Results In general, significantly higher R t and R s were observed in humid regions. Interestingly, while multi‐year extreme droughts caused worse impacts than single extreme droughts on R s , they did not affect R t among drought events. Specifically, R t in arid regions was phylogenetically conserved and largely depended on wood density (WD) and hydraulic safety margin (HSM), while in humid regions, it was closely linked to climate, SLA, and HSM. Main Conclusions These findings provide new insights on the forest responses to different types of droughts, emphasising an ecological and evolutionary framework of jointly considering environmental conditions, phylogeny, and functional traits in predicting growth resilience to guide management under more arid conditions.

Global Ecology and BiogeographyVol. 34(10)
Peking University (CN), Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología (ES), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research (CN), Chengdu Institute of Biology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.