Effectiveness, Efficiency and Impact in Restorative Justice

Abstract The international debate around institutionalisation in restorative justice reveals tensions in service evaluation between maximalist definitions advocating for professionalisation within criminal justice systems and purist definitions aiming to disrupt traditional justice systems. Evaluations offer important metrics for understanding success, but academics argue that these metrics misalign with restorative justice values. These were highlighted by academics, practitioners and those with lived experience at the UK All-Party Parliamentary Group on Restorative Justice inquiry. This research explores the criteria practitioners use to define success, builds on the inquiry recommendation and adds to academic literature by using thematic analysis of questionnaire survey data from professionals to explore their definitions of effectiveness, efficiency and impact in restorative justice. This paper aims to understand how institutionalisation impacts practitioners’ definitions and where lived experience challenges or offers new success metrics. It highlights the multi-faceted nature of success in restorative justice and identifies potential methods for evidencing success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Restorative Justice
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/25890905-bja010003
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness, Efficiency and Impact in Restorative Justice

Anamika Twyman-Ghoshal, Jonathan Hobson, Benjamin M. Fisk
The International Journal of Restorative Justice
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Effectiveness, Efficiency and Impact in Restorative Justice

Anamika Twyman-Ghoshal, Jonathan Hobson, Benjamin M. Fisk
article en

Abstract

Abstract The international debate around institutionalisation in restorative justice reveals tensions in service evaluation between maximalist definitions advocating for professionalisation within criminal justice systems and purist definitions aiming to disrupt traditional justice systems. Evaluations offer important metrics for understanding success, but academics argue that these metrics misalign with restorative justice values. These were highlighted by academics, practitioners and those with lived experience at the UK All-Party Parliamentary Group on Restorative Justice inquiry. This research explores the criteria practitioners use to define success, builds on the inquiry recommendation and adds to academic literature by using thematic analysis of questionnaire survey data from professionals to explore their definitions of effectiveness, efficiency and impact in restorative justice. This paper aims to understand how institutionalisation impacts practitioners’ definitions and where lived experience challenges or offers new success metrics. It highlights the multi-faceted nature of success in restorative justice and identifies potential methods for evidencing success.

The International Journal of Restorative Justice
University of Gloucestershire (GB), Brunel University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effectiveness, Efficiency and Impact in Restorative Justice — Anamika Twyman-Ghoshal, Jonathan Hobson, et al. · The International Journal of Restorative Justice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS