What Do AI Images Want? Three AI-DDP Assemblages in Contemporary Korea

Abstract This article explores the aesthetics of artificial intelligence ( AI ) images by analyzing three cases: Patrik Schumacher’s design experiment through the use of text-to-image AI tools (2023), Refik Anadol’s Seoul Haemong (2019) and Yiyun Kang’s Geofuture (2022–2023), all of which use Zaha Hadid Architects’ Dongdaemun Design Plaza as a referent or a background. While Schumacher uses AI as a design method, Anadol and Kang focus on interactivity through outdoor AI exhibitions, which assume lively interaction between their works and visitors but loosely grapple with its elusive nature. They present a flattened sense of the world in which the lived experiences and scattered visual data from daily lives are reassembled and epigenetically generate new affects, percepts, and moods. By regarding Bruno Latour’s postcritical stance and Catherine Malabou’s concept of plasticity as thresholds, the article encourages us to rethink AI images as nonhuman assemblages that consist of forms of life and evolving technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asiascape Digital Asia
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/22142312-bja10076
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Do AI Images Want? Three AI-DDP Assemblages in Contemporary Korea

Seunghan Paek
Asiascape Digital Asia
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

What Do AI Images Want? Three AI-DDP Assemblages in Contemporary Korea

Seunghan Paek
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the aesthetics of artificial intelligence ( AI ) images by analyzing three cases: Patrik Schumacher’s design experiment through the use of text-to-image AI tools (2023), Refik Anadol’s Seoul Haemong (2019) and Yiyun Kang’s Geofuture (2022–2023), all of which use Zaha Hadid Architects’ Dongdaemun Design Plaza as a referent or a background. While Schumacher uses AI as a design method, Anadol and Kang focus on interactivity through outdoor AI exhibitions, which assume lively interaction between their works and visitors but loosely grapple with its elusive nature. They present a flattened sense of the world in which the lived experiences and scattered visual data from daily lives are reassembled and epigenetically generate new affects, percepts, and moods. By regarding Bruno Latour’s postcritical stance and Catherine Malabou’s concept of plasticity as thresholds, the article encourages us to rethink AI images as nonhuman assemblages that consist of forms of life and evolving technologies.

Asiascape Digital AsiaVol. 12(1-3)
Pusan National University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.