Building Metaverses with (or without) AI: Variegated AI Imaginaries in China’s National and Local Metaverse Policies

Abstract Since 2021, the global ‘Year of the Metaverse’, the Chinese government has appeared more proactive than its tech giants, treating the metaverse as both a new economic growth engine and a chance to enhance global leadership. Over the past three years, authorities at all levels have issued numerous policies aimed at fostering domestic metaverse industries while maintaining regulatory control. This study systematically reviews these policies, revealing a notable level of ambiguity, inconsistency, and complexity – characterized as localism in China’s digital policymaking. By paying particular attention to how AI is positioned in China’s multi-tiered regulatory constructs of the metaverse – a futurist landscape driven by a web of interconnected innovations – this study highlights that dynamic central-local relationships contribute to variegated AI imaginaries in China. This localism perspective sheds light on how subnational and smaller-scale stakeholders, though often overlooked, still play crucial roles in shaping global socio-technical imaginaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asiascape Digital Asia
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/22142312-bja10072
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building Metaverses with (or without) AI: Variegated AI Imaginaries in China’s National and Local Metaverse Policies

Jiaxi Hou
Asiascape Digital Asia
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Building Metaverses with (or without) AI: Variegated AI Imaginaries in China’s National and Local Metaverse Policies

Jiaxi Hou
article en

Abstract

Abstract Since 2021, the global ‘Year of the Metaverse’, the Chinese government has appeared more proactive than its tech giants, treating the metaverse as both a new economic growth engine and a chance to enhance global leadership. Over the past three years, authorities at all levels have issued numerous policies aimed at fostering domestic metaverse industries while maintaining regulatory control. This study systematically reviews these policies, revealing a notable level of ambiguity, inconsistency, and complexity – characterized as localism in China’s digital policymaking. By paying particular attention to how AI is positioned in China’s multi-tiered regulatory constructs of the metaverse – a futurist landscape driven by a web of interconnected innovations – this study highlights that dynamic central-local relationships contribute to variegated AI imaginaries in China. This localism perspective sheds light on how subnational and smaller-scale stakeholders, though often overlooked, still play crucial roles in shaping global socio-technical imaginaries.

Asiascape Digital AsiaVol. 12(1-3)
MIT University (MK), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.