Status and the Self: Socioeconomic Inequality in Core Beliefs

OBJECTIVE: In popular discourse, personal success is often attributed to mindset. In psychological science, such claims correspond to self-related core beliefs-generalized self-representations. However, the lack of a comprehensive framework has prevented systematic investigation of their links to socioeconomic inequality. The present study aimed to provide the first systematic mapping of how socioeconomic status (SES) is reflected in individuals' core beliefs. METHOD: Building on the CorBel model-an integrative taxonomy of 97 belief nuances derived via natural language processing-we analyzed two preregistered, SES-representative national samples (Germany: N = 435, UK: N = 266). RESULTS: Positive beliefs (e.g., competence, autonomy, trust) were associated with higher SES, whereas negative beliefs (e.g., insecurity, unworthiness, pessimism) were associated with lower SES. These associations replicated across SES indicators (education, income, wealth) and across countries, explaining up to 20% of the variance in SES outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings offer the first systematic mapping of how socioeconomic inequalities are mirrored in individuals' innermost psychological constitution. Core beliefs emerge as potential targets for interventions with both societal and policy relevance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Personality
Published
2026-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.70085
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Status and the Self: Socioeconomic Inequality in Core Beliefs

Matthias Ziegler, Patrick Mussel, Niklas Schulte
Journal of Personality
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Status and the Self: Socioeconomic Inequality in Core Beliefs

Matthias Ziegler, Patrick Mussel, Niklas Schulte
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In popular discourse, personal success is often attributed to mindset. In psychological science, such claims correspond to self-related core beliefs-generalized self-representations. However, the lack of a comprehensive framework has prevented systematic investigation of their links to socioeconomic inequality. The present study aimed to provide the first systematic mapping of how socioeconomic status (SES) is reflected in individuals' core beliefs. METHOD: Building on the CorBel model-an integrative taxonomy of 97 belief nuances derived via natural language processing-we analyzed two preregistered, SES-representative national samples (Germany: N = 435, UK: N = 266). RESULTS: Positive beliefs (e.g., competence, autonomy, trust) were associated with higher SES, whereas negative beliefs (e.g., insecurity, unworthiness, pessimism) were associated with lower SES. These associations replicated across SES indicators (education, income, wealth) and across countries, explaining up to 20% of the variance in SES outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings offer the first systematic mapping of how socioeconomic inequalities are mirrored in individuals' innermost psychological constitution. Core beliefs emerge as potential targets for interventions with both societal and policy relevance.

Journal of Personality
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Psychologische Hochschule Berlin (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Status and the Self: Socioeconomic Inequality in Core Beliefs — Matthias Ziegler, Patrick Mussel, et al. · Journal of Personality (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS