Multimodal Behavioral Sensors for Lie Detection: Integrating Visual, Auditory, and Generative Reasoning Cues
Advances in multimodal artificial intelligence enable new sensor-inspired approaches to lie detection by combining behavioral perception with generative reasoning. This study presents a deception detection framework that integrates deep video and audio processing with large language models guided by chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. We interpret neural architectures such as ViViT (for video) and HuBERT (for speech) as digital behavioral sensors that extract implicit emotional and cognitive cues, including micro-expressions, vocal stress, and timing irregularities. We further incorporate a GPT-5-based prompt-level fusion approach for video-language-emotion alignment and zero-shot inference. This method jointly processes visual frames, textual transcripts, and emotion recognition outputs, enabling the system to generate interpretable deception hypotheses without any task-specific fine-tuning. Facial expressions are treated as high-resolution affective signals captured via visual sensors, while audio encodes prosodic markers of stress. Our experimental setup is based on the DOLOS dataset, which provides high-quality multimodal recordings of deceptive and truthful behavior. We also evaluate a continual learning setup that transfers emotional understanding to deception classification. Results indicate that multimodal fusion and CoT-based reasoning increase classification accuracy and interpretability. The proposed system bridges the gap between raw behavioral data and semantic inference, laying a foundation for AI-driven lie detection with interpretable sensor analogues.
Authors
- Khalid Saeed (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7741-7045)
- Daniel Grabowski
- Kamila Łuczaj
Institutions
- Warsaw University of Technology (PL)
- University of the Coast (CO)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Sensors
- Published
- 2025-10-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/s25196086
- Primary Topic
- Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00