FRIDA: A Four-Factor Adaptive Screening Tool for Demoralization, Anxiety, Irritability, and Depression in Hospital Patients

<b>Background</b>: Demoralization, anxiety, irritability, and depression are common among hospital patients and are associated with poorer outcomes and greater healthcare burden. Early identification is essential, but simultaneous screening across multiple domains is often impractical with questionnaires. Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) offers a solution by tailoring item administration, reducing test length while preserving measurement precision. The aim of this study was to develop and validate FRIDA (Four-factor Rapid Interactive Diagnostic Assessment), a freely accessible, web-based CAT for rapid multidimensional screening of psychopathology in hospital patients. <b>Methods</b>: We analysed data from 472 medically ill in-patients at a University Hospital. Item calibration was performed using a four-factor graded response model (demoralization, anxiety, irritability, depression) in the mirt package. CAT simulations were run with 1000 virtual respondents to optimize item selection, exposure control, and stopping rules. The best configuration was applied to the real dataset. Criterion validity for demoralization was evaluated against the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR). <b>Results</b>: The four-factor model showed good fit (CFI = 0.947, RMSEA = 0.080). Factor correlations were moderate to high, with the strongest overlap between demoralization and depression (r = 0.93). In simulations, the CAT required, on average, 7.8 items and recovered trait estimates with high accuracy (r = 0.94-0.97). In real patients, mean test length was 11 items, with accuracy of r = 0.95 across domains. FRIDA demonstrated good criterion validity for demoralization (AUC = 0.816; sensitivity 80%, specificity 67.5%). <b>Conclusions</b>: FRIDA is the first freely available, multidimensional CAT for rapid screening of psychopathology in hospital patients. It offers a scalable, efficient, and precise tool for integrating mental health assessment into routine hospital care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196992
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FRIDA: A Four-Factor Adaptive Screening Tool for Demoralization, Anxiety, Irritability, and Depression in Hospital Patients

Guido Sciavicco, Marco Cruciata, Luigi Zerbinati, Rosangela Caruso et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
2.11
article

FRIDA: A Four-Factor Adaptive Screening Tool for Demoralization, Anxiety, Irritability, and Depression in Hospital Patients

Guido Sciavicco, Marco Cruciata, Luigi Zerbinati, Rosangela Caruso, Federica Sancassiani, Mauro Giovanni Carta, Tommaso Toffanin, Luigi Giuseppe Grassi, Martino Belvederi Murri, Maria Giulia Nanni, Chiara Montemitro, Angela Muscettola, Michele Specchia
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Demoralization, anxiety, irritability, and depression are common among hospital patients and are associated with poorer outcomes and greater healthcare burden. Early identification is essential, but simultaneous screening across multiple domains is often impractical with questionnaires. Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) offers a solution by tailoring item administration, reducing test length while preserving measurement precision. The aim of this study was to develop and validate FRIDA (Four-factor Rapid Interactive Diagnostic Assessment), a freely accessible, web-based CAT for rapid multidimensional screening of psychopathology in hospital patients. <b>Methods</b>: We analysed data from 472 medically ill in-patients at a University Hospital. Item calibration was performed using a four-factor graded response model (demoralization, anxiety, irritability, depression) in the mirt package. CAT simulations were run with 1000 virtual respondents to optimize item selection, exposure control, and stopping rules. The best configuration was applied to the real dataset. Criterion validity for demoralization was evaluated against the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR). <b>Results</b>: The four-factor model showed good fit (CFI = 0.947, RMSEA = 0.080). Factor correlations were moderate to high, with the strongest overlap between demoralization and depression (r = 0.93). In simulations, the CAT required, on average, 7.8 items and recovered trait estimates with high accuracy (r = 0.94-0.97). In real patients, mean test length was 11 items, with accuracy of r = 0.95 across domains. FRIDA demonstrated good criterion validity for demoralization (AUC = 0.816; sensitivity 80%, specificity 67.5%). <b>Conclusions</b>: FRIDA is the first freely available, multidimensional CAT for rapid screening of psychopathology in hospital patients. It offers a scalable, efficient, and precise tool for integrating mental health assessment into routine hospital care.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(19)
University of Cagliari (IT), University of Ferrara (IT), Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Ferrara (IT)
Università degli Studi di Ferrara
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.