Kinematic Comparison of Different Types of Start Technique in Bi-Finswimming

<b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to experimentally investigate the biomechanical and performance differences between the grab start (GS) and the kick start (KS) with each leg on the kickplate (KSR, KSL) in Bi-Finswimming (BFS). It focused on the effect of foot placement on the starting block, equipped with an adjustable, inclined rear kickplate (Omega, OSB11), to determine potential performance advantages and contribute evidence-based recommendations for optimizing start techniques in competitive BFS. <b>Methods:</b> Thirteen national-level finswimmers (seven males, six females; age: 17.7 ± 2.1 years) voluntarily participated. Each athlete performed two trials of three start techniques (GS, KSR, KSL) over three days in a randomized order. Four synchronized cameras recorded video data. Performance metrics (time to 5 m (T5), 15 m (T15), 25 m (T25), reaction time, block time (BT), flight time (FT), and entry characteristics) along with joint angles (hip, knee, ankle), were analyzed using Kinovea software (v. 2024.1). A two-way repeated measures ANOVA (start type × gender) was conducted to analyze performance metrics, and a paired-sample t-test assessed differences in joint angles. Also, correlations between dependent (type of start) and independent variables (start-examined variables) were examined through bivariate Pearson's r analysis. <b>Results:</b> No significant gender differences were found (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Significant differences emerged between the starting techniques, with KS showing faster T5, T15, and T25 (<i>p</i> < 0.001, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.6; <i>p</i> < 0.001, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.5; <i>p</i> < 0.05, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.3, respectively). BT was significantly longer in GS compared to KS (<i>p</i> < 0.001, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.8), while FT was shorter in GS (<i>p</i> = 0.002, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.4). Faster T5, T15, and T25 were associated with increased flight distance and longer FT in KSL. <b>Conclusions:</b> The kick start generally outperforms the grab start, especially in block time, in Bi-Finswimming. These preliminary results suggest that it could be considered for future discussion regarding potential legalization by the World Underwater Federation, pending further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10040384
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kinematic Comparison of Different Types of Start Technique in Bi-Finswimming

George Tsalis, Ioannis Kostoulas, Αναστάσιος Παπαδόπουλος, Konstantinos Papadimitriou et al.
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Sports Performance and Training
article

Kinematic Comparison of Different Types of Start Technique in Bi-Finswimming

George Tsalis, Ioannis Kostoulas, Αναστάσιος Παπαδόπουλος, Konstantinos Papadimitriou, Gregory Kalaitzoglidis
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to experimentally investigate the biomechanical and performance differences between the grab start (GS) and the kick start (KS) with each leg on the kickplate (KSR, KSL) in Bi-Finswimming (BFS). It focused on the effect of foot placement on the starting block, equipped with an adjustable, inclined rear kickplate (Omega, OSB11), to determine potential performance advantages and contribute evidence-based recommendations for optimizing start techniques in competitive BFS. <b>Methods:</b> Thirteen national-level finswimmers (seven males, six females; age: 17.7 ± 2.1 years) voluntarily participated. Each athlete performed two trials of three start techniques (GS, KSR, KSL) over three days in a randomized order. Four synchronized cameras recorded video data. Performance metrics (time to 5 m (T5), 15 m (T15), 25 m (T25), reaction time, block time (BT), flight time (FT), and entry characteristics) along with joint angles (hip, knee, ankle), were analyzed using Kinovea software (v. 2024.1). A two-way repeated measures ANOVA (start type × gender) was conducted to analyze performance metrics, and a paired-sample t-test assessed differences in joint angles. Also, correlations between dependent (type of start) and independent variables (start-examined variables) were examined through bivariate Pearson's r analysis. <b>Results:</b> No significant gender differences were found (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Significant differences emerged between the starting techniques, with KS showing faster T5, T15, and T25 (<i>p</i> < 0.001, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.6; <i>p</i> < 0.001, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.5; <i>p</i> < 0.05, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.3, respectively). BT was significantly longer in GS compared to KS (<i>p</i> < 0.001, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.8), while FT was shorter in GS (<i>p</i> = 0.002, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.4). Faster T5, T15, and T25 were associated with increased flight distance and longer FT in KSL. <b>Conclusions:</b> The kick start generally outperforms the grab start, especially in block time, in Bi-Finswimming. These preliminary results suggest that it could be considered for future discussion regarding potential legalization by the World Underwater Federation, pending further research.

Journal of Functional Morphology and KinesiologyVol. 10(4)
Democritus University of Thrace (GR), Hellenic Naval Academy (GR), International Hellenic University (GR), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Hellenic Military Academy (GR)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.