Cost and Quality: Student Reflections on OER and Academic Engagement

This article shares the analysis of surveys conducted across the first year (2022-2023) of participating courses in OER Leads, an OER adoption faculty incentive program at Pennsylvania State University, to assess the perception and value of the newly adopted OER among the impacted students. Areas of focus include the impact of those costs on students’ educational experiences and decisions, as well as students’ perceptions of their course’s open course materials in terms of their quality and utility for learning activities. We also share our interpretations of these survey results and our reflections on possible takeaways for OER practitioners and supporters, especially in terms of the impact of course material costs on student learning and engagement. Additionally, our survey results add to the continually growing evidence that adoption of open, library-licensed, and/or affordable course materials has a positive impact on student engagement and well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Open Initiatives in Academic Libraries
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58997/eym3ft76
Primary Topic
Open Education and E-Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost and Quality: Student Reflections on OER and Academic Engagement

Christina Riehman-Murphy, Lianhe Li, Katie Odhner, Amy Deuink et al.
Journal of Open Initiatives in Academic Libraries
Open Education and E-Learning
article

Cost and Quality: Student Reflections on OER and Academic Engagement

Christina Riehman-Murphy, Lianhe Li, Katie Odhner, Amy Deuink, Bryan McGeary, Elizabeth Nelson
article en

Abstract

This article shares the analysis of surveys conducted across the first year (2022-2023) of participating courses in OER Leads, an OER adoption faculty incentive program at Pennsylvania State University, to assess the perception and value of the newly adopted OER among the impacted students. Areas of focus include the impact of those costs on students’ educational experiences and decisions, as well as students’ perceptions of their course’s open course materials in terms of their quality and utility for learning activities. We also share our interpretations of these survey results and our reflections on possible takeaways for OER practitioners and supporters, especially in terms of the impact of course material costs on student learning and engagement. Additionally, our survey results add to the continually growing evidence that adoption of open, library-licensed, and/or affordable course materials has a positive impact on student engagement and well-being.

Journal of Open Initiatives in Academic LibrariesVol. 1(1)
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Open Education and E-Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cost and Quality: Student Reflections on OER and Academic Engagement — Christina Riehman-Murphy, Lianhe Li, et al. · Journal of Open Initiatives in Academic Libraries (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS