Prospective Employees and their Criminal Records: Challenges for a Relevant Matching Approach

Abstract In Chap. 5 of his book Ethics and Situational Crime Prevention , Thomas Søbirk Petersen addresses the questions of whether and when employers should have access to the criminal records of prospective employees. Given the well-established link between ex-offenders being able to secure employment and their desistance from further crimes, Petersen argues that it is vital to limit how much employers can come to discover about the criminal pasts of people whom they might hire. Petersen urges a “relevant matching” approach to employer access to criminal records. Several challenges to implementing such an approach are discussed. These include doubts about how often we will have empirical verification of relevant matches, how serious past crimes must be before they are subject to disclosure, whether individuals’ criminal records should ever lapse, and whether recidivist minor offenders should have their records disclosed. Then there are the problems raised by low conviction rates for many crimes and biased policing, both of which produce skewed pictures of who has committed crimes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Res Publica
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-025-09735-w
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prospective Employees and their Criminal Records: Challenges for a Relevant Matching Approach

Richard L. Lippke
Res Publica
Crime Patterns and Interventions
article

Prospective Employees and their Criminal Records: Challenges for a Relevant Matching Approach

Richard L. Lippke
article en

Abstract

Abstract In Chap. 5 of his book Ethics and Situational Crime Prevention , Thomas Søbirk Petersen addresses the questions of whether and when employers should have access to the criminal records of prospective employees. Given the well-established link between ex-offenders being able to secure employment and their desistance from further crimes, Petersen argues that it is vital to limit how much employers can come to discover about the criminal pasts of people whom they might hire. Petersen urges a “relevant matching” approach to employer access to criminal records. Several challenges to implementing such an approach are discussed. These include doubts about how often we will have empirical verification of relevant matches, how serious past crimes must be before they are subject to disclosure, whether individuals’ criminal records should ever lapse, and whether recidivist minor offenders should have their records disclosed. Then there are the problems raised by low conviction rates for many crimes and biased policing, both of which produce skewed pictures of who has committed crimes.

Res Publica
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.