Integration of Radical Intent Treatment in Colorectal Liver Metastases
Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) management remains a complex conundrum in the context of potential curable disease. The combination of systemic therapy and surgery, with overall survival outcomes up to 58% at five years, has become the gold standard. Locoregional therapies have gained evidence in complementing surgery or even substituting it in selected cases. Adequate patient selection is paramount, but prognostic models have certain limitations that prevent their full implementation in clinical practice. A plethora of prognostic factors exists, with variable evidence supporting their definitive role. Thus, CRLM management decisions frequently vary depending on multidisciplinary team experience and hospital access to systemic and locoregional treatments. Definition of resectability has evolved in recent years due to technical developments in surgical and non-surgical approaches. Complexity is added when trying to fully understand the integration between local and systemic treatment. Whereas evidence in the context of resectable disease has been attempted in several phase III trials, definitive conclusions regarding the best approach to potentially resectable disease cannot be drawn. In addition, liver transplantation has gained evidence and is proposed in selected patients, raising a challenge regarding its integration and wider implementation. In this review, current standards in the management of CRLM regarding patient selection, resectability, surgical and non-surgical locoregional strategies, as well as the best systemic approach are covered.
Authors
- Javier Gállego (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0584-1242)
- Francisco José Pelegrín Mateo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4340-9493)
Institutions
- Hospital General Universitario de Elche (ES)
- Hospital Vega Baja (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Onco
- Published
- 2025-10-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/onco5040045
- Primary Topic
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00