Decoding Anticancer Drug Response: Comparison of Data-Driven and Pathway-Guided Prediction Models

Background/Objective: Predicting pharmacological response in cancer remains a key challenge in precision oncology due to intertumoral heterogeneity and the complexity of drug–gene interactions. While machine learning models using multi-omics data have shown promise in predicting pharmacological response, selecting the features with the highest predictive power critically affects model performance and biological interpretability. This study aims to compare computational and biologically informed gene selection strategies for predicting drug response in cancer cell lines and to propose a feature selection strategy that optimizes performance. Methods: Using gene expression and drug response data, we trained models on both data-driven and biologically informed gene sets based on the drug target pathways to predict IC50 values for seven anticancer drugs. Several feature selection methods were tested on gene expression profiles of cancer cell lines, including Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) with Support Vector Regression (SVR) against gene sets derived from drug-specific pathways in KEGG and CTD databases. The predictability was comparatively analyzed using both AUC and IC50 values and further assessed on proteomics data. Results: RFE with SVR outperformed other computational methods, while pathway-based gene sets showed lower performance compared to data-driven methods. The integration of computational and biologically informed gene sets consistently improved prediction accuracy across several anticancer drugs, while the predictive value of the corresponding proteomic features was significantly lower compared with the mRNA profiles. Conclusions: Integrating biological knowledge into feature selection enhances both the accuracy and interpretability of drug response prediction models. Integrative approaches offer a more robust and generalizable framework with potential applications in biomarker discovery, drug repurposing, and personalized treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Pharmacology
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/futurepharmacol5040058
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding Anticancer Drug Response: Comparison of Data-Driven and Pathway-Guided Prediction Models

Georgios Tzimagiorgis, Georgios Aivaliotis, Ioannis S. Vizirianakis, Andigoni Malousi et al.
Future Pharmacology
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Decoding Anticancer Drug Response: Comparison of Data-Driven and Pathway-Guided Prediction Models

Georgios Tzimagiorgis, Georgios Aivaliotis, Ioannis S. Vizirianakis, Andigoni Malousi, Mingrui Zhang, Efstathios Pateras
article en

Abstract

Background/Objective: Predicting pharmacological response in cancer remains a key challenge in precision oncology due to intertumoral heterogeneity and the complexity of drug–gene interactions. While machine learning models using multi-omics data have shown promise in predicting pharmacological response, selecting the features with the highest predictive power critically affects model performance and biological interpretability. This study aims to compare computational and biologically informed gene selection strategies for predicting drug response in cancer cell lines and to propose a feature selection strategy that optimizes performance. Methods: Using gene expression and drug response data, we trained models on both data-driven and biologically informed gene sets based on the drug target pathways to predict IC50 values for seven anticancer drugs. Several feature selection methods were tested on gene expression profiles of cancer cell lines, including Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) with Support Vector Regression (SVR) against gene sets derived from drug-specific pathways in KEGG and CTD databases. The predictability was comparatively analyzed using both AUC and IC50 values and further assessed on proteomics data. Results: RFE with SVR outperformed other computational methods, while pathway-based gene sets showed lower performance compared to data-driven methods. The integration of computational and biologically informed gene sets consistently improved prediction accuracy across several anticancer drugs, while the predictive value of the corresponding proteomic features was significantly lower compared with the mRNA profiles. Conclusions: Integrating biological knowledge into feature selection enhances both the accuracy and interpretability of drug response prediction models. Integrative approaches offer a more robust and generalizable framework with potential applications in biomarker discovery, drug repurposing, and personalized treatment strategies.

Future PharmacologyVol. 5(4)
University of Leeds (GB), University of Nicosia (CY), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.