Reproductive coercion: the role of clinicians in general practice

Reproductive coercion (RC) is a form of gender-based violence that directly undermines reproductive autonomy, and can result in significant sexual, reproductive and mental health harms. Clinicians in general practice are well-positioned to address RC, given the central role of general practice in sexual and reproductive health care, as well as domestic and family violence response. Yet, RC often remains poorly understood in this setting, and guidance for clinical responses is underdeveloped. In this forum article, we examine why RC should be prioritised in general practice settings, outline what an appropriate response could involve in general practice, and discuss the system-, clinician-, and patient-level challenges and considerations to identifying and responding to RC in general practice. We also draw attention to how clinical practices, particularly in sexual and reproductive health care, can unintentionally reproduce dynamics of RC, and must be consciously managed to uphold patient autonomy. We argue for a more intentional role for general practice in RC recognition and response, underpinned by context-specific evidence-based guidelines, targeted training and integrated system-level support, to safeguard reproductive autonomy among general practice patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Primary Health
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/py25124
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reproductive coercion: the role of clinicians in general practice

Danielle Mazza, Susan Saldanha, Stella May Gwini, Khue Le et al.
Australian Journal of Primary Health
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Reproductive coercion: the role of clinicians in general practice

Danielle Mazza, Susan Saldanha, Stella May Gwini, Khue Le, Jessica R. Botfield
article en

Abstract

Reproductive coercion (RC) is a form of gender-based violence that directly undermines reproductive autonomy, and can result in significant sexual, reproductive and mental health harms. Clinicians in general practice are well-positioned to address RC, given the central role of general practice in sexual and reproductive health care, as well as domestic and family violence response. Yet, RC often remains poorly understood in this setting, and guidance for clinical responses is underdeveloped. In this forum article, we examine why RC should be prioritised in general practice settings, outline what an appropriate response could involve in general practice, and discuss the system-, clinician-, and patient-level challenges and considerations to identifying and responding to RC in general practice. We also draw attention to how clinical practices, particularly in sexual and reproductive health care, can unintentionally reproduce dynamics of RC, and must be consciously managed to uphold patient autonomy. We argue for a more intentional role for general practice in RC recognition and response, underpinned by context-specific evidence-based guidelines, targeted training and integrated system-level support, to safeguard reproductive autonomy among general practice patients.

Australian Journal of Primary HealthVol. 31(5)
Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (AU), Monash Health (AU), Human Growth Foundation (US), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reproductive coercion: the role of clinicians in general practice — Danielle Mazza, Susan Saldanha, et al. · Australian Journal of Primary Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS