Pandemics and Partisanship: The Impact of Political Identity on Public Health Responses

This literature review examines the intersection of political partisanship and public health responses during pandemics, with a focus on the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Historically, pandemics such as the Venetian plague (1575-1577) and the Great Plague of London (1665-1666) have elicited responses driven by socioeconomic and health factors. In contrast, the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. was distinctly shaped by pre-existing political affiliations, particularly between conservative and liberal factions. Applying Social Identity Theory (SIT), this review explores how group identity and partisanship influenced pandemic-related behaviors and attitudes. Empirical evidence indicates that Republican-leaning states experienced higher COVID-19 mortality rates, driven by resistance to public health measures. The review identifies gaps in the literature, particularly the need for controlling socioeconomic and health vulnerability variables to isolate the direct effect of polarization on pandemic responses. The findings underscore the significant role of partisanship in shaping public health outcomes and suggest that future research should further quantify its impact to inform more effective public health strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Midwest Social Sciences Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22543/2766-0796.1160
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pandemics and Partisanship: The Impact of Political Identity on Public Health Responses

Andy Tuholski
Midwest Social Sciences Journal
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Pandemics and Partisanship: The Impact of Political Identity on Public Health Responses

Andy Tuholski
article en

Abstract

This literature review examines the intersection of political partisanship and public health responses during pandemics, with a focus on the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Historically, pandemics such as the Venetian plague (1575-1577) and the Great Plague of London (1665-1666) have elicited responses driven by socioeconomic and health factors. In contrast, the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. was distinctly shaped by pre-existing political affiliations, particularly between conservative and liberal factions. Applying Social Identity Theory (SIT), this review explores how group identity and partisanship influenced pandemic-related behaviors and attitudes. Empirical evidence indicates that Republican-leaning states experienced higher COVID-19 mortality rates, driven by resistance to public health measures. The review identifies gaps in the literature, particularly the need for controlling socioeconomic and health vulnerability variables to isolate the direct effect of polarization on pandemic responses. The findings underscore the significant role of partisanship in shaping public health outcomes and suggest that future research should further quantify its impact to inform more effective public health strategies.

Midwest Social Sciences JournalVol. 28(1)
Indiana University Kokomo (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pandemics and Partisanship: The Impact of Political Identity on Public Health Responses — Andy Tuholski · Midwest Social Sciences Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS