Hazards to Public Interests: Essence and Manifestations

Public hazards, threats, and risks are studied by the general theory of national security. Russian scientists differentiate between the concepts of challenge, hazard, and threat. The authors used such interdisciplinary, dialectical, and socio-ecological approaches and methods as political science analysis and inclusive observation to describe the essential characteristics of these terms and develop their own definitions. A hazard has a non-targeted nature, i.e., it has neither intention to cause damage nor targeted resource provision. It differs from challenge and threat in that it is deprived of directions, goals, and resources. The current global hazards to basic public interests include nuclear and chemical terrorism, artificial intelligence, media, uncontrolled technological development, genetic or biological weapons, and man-made or natural environmental processes. By identifying the range of direct and indirect hazards, the government chooses national priorities, as well as opportunities for engaging non-governmental, public, and resource potential. Most modern hazards are inherent with civilizational progress and human interaction with nature that does not rely on co-evolution. As the ongoing technological development leads to an information-oriented type of society, new natural and public hazards are bound to occur.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Kemerovo State University Series Political Sociological and Economic sciences
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2025-10-3-382-390
Primary Topic
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hazards to Public Interests: Essence and Manifestations

Aleksey P. Sitnikov
Bulletin of Kemerovo State University Series Political Sociological and Economic sciences
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
article

Hazards to Public Interests: Essence and Manifestations

Aleksey P. Sitnikov
article en

Abstract

Public hazards, threats, and risks are studied by the general theory of national security. Russian scientists differentiate between the concepts of challenge, hazard, and threat. The authors used such interdisciplinary, dialectical, and socio-ecological approaches and methods as political science analysis and inclusive observation to describe the essential characteristics of these terms and develop their own definitions. A hazard has a non-targeted nature, i.e., it has neither intention to cause damage nor targeted resource provision. It differs from challenge and threat in that it is deprived of directions, goals, and resources. The current global hazards to basic public interests include nuclear and chemical terrorism, artificial intelligence, media, uncontrolled technological development, genetic or biological weapons, and man-made or natural environmental processes. By identifying the range of direct and indirect hazards, the government chooses national priorities, as well as opportunities for engaging non-governmental, public, and resource potential. Most modern hazards are inherent with civilizational progress and human interaction with nature that does not rely on co-evolution. As the ongoing technological development leads to an information-oriented type of society, new natural and public hazards are bound to occur.

Bulletin of Kemerovo State University Series Political Sociological and Economic sciencesVol. 10(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.