The socio-technicities of campaigning as a form of planning: lessons from the <i>Hamara Shehar Mumbai Abhiyaan</i> in Mumbai and the <i>Main Bhi Dilli</i> campaign in Delhi

Urban planning in Southern cities is generally a technocratic exercise, often detached from the realities of informal settlements, workers and marginalized groups. It can reinforce socio-spatial inequalities by prioritizing globalized visions over inclusive, people-centred plans. This paper reflects on two civil society organizations (CSO)-led campaigns: Hamara Shehar Mumbai (2011–2016) for Mumbai’s Development Plan 2014–2034 and Main Bhi Dilli (2018–2021) for Delhi’s Master Plan 2021–2041. Drawing from first-hand engagement, it explores how these initiatives sought to democratize planning through socio-technical strategies. Operating within rigid state-led frameworks, they expanded participation by leveraging both formal and informal modes. Their approaches – co-producing knowledge, engaging with maps and innovating participatory tactics – enabled limited but meaningful influence. Despite constraints, they created spaces for community-led engagement. Positioned as ‘limited insurgencies’, these campaigns highlight the potential of coalitions to outlive formal timelines and seed long-term ‘socio-technical infrastructures’ for counter-planning rooted in lived experience, resisting exclusionary, top-down planning in Indian and Southern cities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Urbanization
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09562478251364655
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The socio-technicities of campaigning as a form of planning: lessons from the Hamara Shehar Mumbai Abhiyaan in Mumbai and the Main Bhi Dilli campaign in Delhi

Marina Rajan Joseph, Shalaka, Aravind Unni
Environment and Urbanization
Urban Planning and Governance
article

The socio-technicities of campaigning as a form of planning: lessons from the Hamara Shehar Mumbai Abhiyaan in Mumbai and the Main Bhi Dilli campaign in Delhi

Marina Rajan Joseph, Shalaka, Aravind Unni
article en

Abstract

Urban planning in Southern cities is generally a technocratic exercise, often detached from the realities of informal settlements, workers and marginalized groups. It can reinforce socio-spatial inequalities by prioritizing globalized visions over inclusive, people-centred plans. This paper reflects on two civil society organizations (CSO)-led campaigns: Hamara Shehar Mumbai (2011–2016) for Mumbai’s Development Plan 2014–2034 and Main Bhi Dilli (2018–2021) for Delhi’s Master Plan 2021–2041. Drawing from first-hand engagement, it explores how these initiatives sought to democratize planning through socio-technical strategies. Operating within rigid state-led frameworks, they expanded participation by leveraging both formal and informal modes. Their approaches – co-producing knowledge, engaging with maps and innovating participatory tactics – enabled limited but meaningful influence. Despite constraints, they created spaces for community-led engagement. Positioned as ‘limited insurgencies’, these campaigns highlight the potential of coalitions to outlive formal timelines and seed long-term ‘socio-technical infrastructures’ for counter-planning rooted in lived experience, resisting exclusionary, top-down planning in Indian and Southern cities.

Environment and UrbanizationVol. 37(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.