Selecting and Preparing Clinical Sites for the Successful Conduct of Decentralized Clinical Trial Activities–Findings From the Trials@Home <scp>RADIAL</scp> Proof‐of‐Concept Trial

Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) offer opportunities to improve trial accessibility, participant convenience, and efficiency, yet may pose significant operational challenges for clinical trial sites. This paper presents the operational insights gained from selecting, training, and supporting clinical sites within the RADIAL proof-of-concept trial, part of the Trials@Home project. RADIAL was a multicenter, low-intervention phase IV trial comparing conventional, hybrid, and fully decentralized approaches for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus across six European countries. Site selection involved detailed feasibility assessments evaluating operational capabilities, recruitment potential, technological readiness, and willingness to implement decentralized elements. Despite proactive training, including ongoing support via a centralized helpdesk, sites faced initial difficulties with technology management and participant onboarding. Contractual complexities were prominent, particularly regarding clearly delineating responsibilities and data handling in agreements involving third-party providers. Moreover, integrating third-party services necessitated meticulous oversight strategies and continuous stakeholder coordination to ensure regulatory compliance and efficient trial management. Our experiences underscore essential considerations for future DCT implementations: proactive stakeholder alignment; tailored, timely, and ongoing training and support; intuitive technology design informed by clinical user input; robust, centralized oversight structures; and clearly defined delegation frameworks for third-party engagements. Addressing these operational considerations will facilitate smoother transitions toward decentralized clinical research models, maximizing their potential benefits while managing associated complexities effectively-especially for clinical site staff.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70075
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selecting and Preparing Clinical Sites for the Successful Conduct of Decentralized Clinical Trial Activities–Findings From the Trials@Home RADIAL Proof‐of‐Concept Trial

Lina Pérez–Breva, Diederick E. Grobbee, Bart Lagerwaard, Mira G. P. Zuidgeest et al.
2 citations
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
6.26
article

Selecting and Preparing Clinical Sites for the Successful Conduct of Decentralized Clinical Trial Activities–Findings From the Trials@Home RADIAL Proof‐of‐Concept Trial

Lina Pérez–Breva, Diederick E. Grobbee, Bart Lagerwaard, Mira G. P. Zuidgeest, Katarzyna Lipinska, Megan Heath, Linda Rutgrink, Danny van Weelij, Yvonne van Rijswick, Eduard Vardianu, Petra Naster, Paul Bodfish
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) offer opportunities to improve trial accessibility, participant convenience, and efficiency, yet may pose significant operational challenges for clinical trial sites. This paper presents the operational insights gained from selecting, training, and supporting clinical sites within the RADIAL proof-of-concept trial, part of the Trials@Home project. RADIAL was a multicenter, low-intervention phase IV trial comparing conventional, hybrid, and fully decentralized approaches for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus across six European countries. Site selection involved detailed feasibility assessments evaluating operational capabilities, recruitment potential, technological readiness, and willingness to implement decentralized elements. Despite proactive training, including ongoing support via a centralized helpdesk, sites faced initial difficulties with technology management and participant onboarding. Contractual complexities were prominent, particularly regarding clearly delineating responsibilities and data handling in agreements involving third-party providers. Moreover, integrating third-party services necessitated meticulous oversight strategies and continuous stakeholder coordination to ensure regulatory compliance and efficient trial management. Our experiences underscore essential considerations for future DCT implementations: proactive stakeholder alignment; tailored, timely, and ongoing training and support; intuitive technology design informed by clinical user input; robust, centralized oversight structures; and clearly defined delegation frameworks for third-party engagements. Addressing these operational considerations will facilitate smoother transitions toward decentralized clinical research models, maximizing their potential benefits while managing associated complexities effectively-especially for clinical site staff.

Clinical Pharmacology & TherapeuticsVol. 118(5)
Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), European Distance and E-Learning Network (HU), Sanofi (Netherlands) (NL), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (ES), Belgian Burn Foundation (BE), Fresenius Kabi (Netherlands) (NL), Clinical Trials New Zealand (NZ), Yulius (NL), Societate Comerciala Pentru Cercetare, Proiectare si Productie de Echipamente si Instalatii de Automatizare (Romania) (RO), Sanofi (United Kingdom) (GB)
European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.