Relationship between annual performance reviews and teachers’ performance in primary schools in Mityana district. A cross-sectional study.

Background The annual performance reviews in primary schools evaluate teachers’ work, offering feedback and development opportunities that can boost motivation and teaching quality. The study aimed to examine the relationship between annual performance reviews and teachers’ performance in primary schools in Mityana District. Methodology The study employed a cross-sectional research design, utilizing both quantitative and qualitative research approaches. Simple random sampling and purposive sampling techniques were used. A self-administered questionnaire, interview guide, and focus group discussion were used to obtain data from respondents under each sampled school. Results 51 (45.9%) participants were aged 20-30 years, 32(28.8%) participants were aged 31-40 years, and 8(7.3%) were 50 years and above. Correlation results showed a statistically significant positive relationship between annual performance reviews and teachers’ performance (r = .721, p = .000). The adjusted R-squared value of 0.510 indicated that 51% of the variation in teachers’ performance was explained by a unit change in annual performance reviews. Conclusion Annual performance reviews can serve as a valuable mechanism for enhancing teacher performance when they are implemented with clarity, consistency, and developmental intent. Recommendation School administrators should create and disseminate structured performance review frameworks that clearly outline evaluation criteria, timelines, and expectations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SJ Education Research Africa
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51168/bnx2ay75
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationship between annual performance reviews and teachers’ performance in primary schools in Mityana district. A cross-sectional study.

Frank Pio Kiyingi, Rhona Nabaweesi Zavuga
SJ Education Research Africa
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
article

Relationship between annual performance reviews and teachers’ performance in primary schools in Mityana district. A cross-sectional study.

Frank Pio Kiyingi, Rhona Nabaweesi Zavuga
article en

Abstract

Background The annual performance reviews in primary schools evaluate teachers’ work, offering feedback and development opportunities that can boost motivation and teaching quality. The study aimed to examine the relationship between annual performance reviews and teachers’ performance in primary schools in Mityana District. Methodology The study employed a cross-sectional research design, utilizing both quantitative and qualitative research approaches. Simple random sampling and purposive sampling techniques were used. A self-administered questionnaire, interview guide, and focus group discussion were used to obtain data from respondents under each sampled school. Results 51 (45.9%) participants were aged 20-30 years, 32(28.8%) participants were aged 31-40 years, and 8(7.3%) were 50 years and above. Correlation results showed a statistically significant positive relationship between annual performance reviews and teachers’ performance (r = .721, p = .000). The adjusted R-squared value of 0.510 indicated that 51% of the variation in teachers’ performance was explained by a unit change in annual performance reviews. Conclusion Annual performance reviews can serve as a valuable mechanism for enhancing teacher performance when they are implemented with clarity, consistency, and developmental intent. Recommendation School administrators should create and disseminate structured performance review frameworks that clearly outline evaluation criteria, timelines, and expectations.

SJ Education Research AfricaVol. 2(10)
Nkumba University (UG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.