Tajam ke Bawah, Tumpul Ke Atas: Paradoks Penegakan Hukum terhadap Koruptor

Law enforcement in Indonesia continues to face various challenges, particularly in the context of eradicating corruption. The phrase "sharp downward, blunt upward" illustrates the disparity in law enforcement, where corrupt elites often receive lenient treatment while ordinary citizens committing minor offenses face severe punishment. This article analyzes the paradox using a normative-juridical and sociological approach, examining causal factors such as the lack of integrity among law enforcement officers, political interference, and vague legal norms. The study also explores how legal supremacy can be upheld fairly through systemic legal reform, strengthening of anti-corruption institutions, and community participation. By comparing several cases of corruption involving elites and legal violations by the lower class, this article highlights the importance of equality before the law as a fundamental principle of a legal state.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mandub Jurnal Politik Sosial Hukum dan Humaniora
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v3i2.2589
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tajam ke Bawah, Tumpul Ke Atas: Paradoks Penegakan Hukum terhadap Koruptor

Rina Dwi Yanti Tampubolon
Mandub Jurnal Politik Sosial Hukum dan Humaniora
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Tajam ke Bawah, Tumpul Ke Atas: Paradoks Penegakan Hukum terhadap Koruptor

Rina Dwi Yanti Tampubolon
article en

Abstract

Law enforcement in Indonesia continues to face various challenges, particularly in the context of eradicating corruption. The phrase "sharp downward, blunt upward" illustrates the disparity in law enforcement, where corrupt elites often receive lenient treatment while ordinary citizens committing minor offenses face severe punishment. This article analyzes the paradox using a normative-juridical and sociological approach, examining causal factors such as the lack of integrity among law enforcement officers, political interference, and vague legal norms. The study also explores how legal supremacy can be upheld fairly through systemic legal reform, strengthening of anti-corruption institutions, and community participation. By comparing several cases of corruption involving elites and legal violations by the lower class, this article highlights the importance of equality before the law as a fundamental principle of a legal state.

Mandub Jurnal Politik Sosial Hukum dan HumanioraVol. 3(2)
Universitas Bandar Lampung (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tajam ke Bawah, Tumpul Ke Atas: Paradoks Penegakan Hukum terhadap Koruptor — Rina Dwi Yanti Tampubolon · Mandub Jurnal Politik Sosial Hukum dan Humaniora (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS