Evaluation of Decision Support System Models in Tourism Ambassador Selection

<p><em>Tourism Ambassador selection still faces issues of subjectivity in assessment, highlighting the need for an objective system to evaluate various aspects of participant competence. This study aimed to assess the performance of seven Decision Support System methods—SAW, WP, TOPSIS, MOORA, MAUT, PROMETHEE, and SMART—in a selection process based on four criteria: Public Speaking, Tourism Knowledge, English Proficiency, and Talent. Data from 12 participants were analyzed and evaluated using classification accuracy, Mean Absolute Error, Root Mean Square Error, and Spearman and Kendall rank correlations against the actual ranking. The results showed that PROMETHEE delivered the best performance, achieving 100% accuracy with perfect ranking alignment. These findings indicate that PROMETHEE is highly suitable for multi-criteria selection processes requiring high precision in determining result order.</em><em></em></p><p><strong><em>K</em></strong><strong><em>eywords</em></strong><strong><em>:</em></strong><em> Decision Support System; PROMETHEE method; Multi-criteria selection; Method evaluation; Tourism Ambassador</em><em></em></p><p align="center"> </p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Pemilihan Duta Pariwisata masih menghadapi persoalan subjektivitas dalam penilaian, sehingga diperlukan sistem yang lebih objektif untuk menilai berbagai aspek kompetensi peserta. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi kinerja tujuh metode Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, yaitu <em>SAW, WP, TOPSIS, MOORA, MAUT, PROMETHEE</em> dan <em>SMART</em>, dalam proses seleksi berbasis empat kriteria: <em>Public Speaking</em>, Kepariwisataan, Bahasa Inggris, dan Bakat. Data dari 12 peserta dianalisis dan dievaluasi menggunakan metrik akurasi klasifikasi, <em>Mean Absolute Error, Root Mean Square Error</em>, serta korelasi Spearman dan Kendall terhadap ranking asli. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa <em>PROMETHEE</em> memberikan performa terbaik dengan akurasi 100% dan kesesuaian ranking yang sempurna. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa PROMETHEE sangat tepat diterapkan dalam proses seleksi multi-kriteria yang memerlukan ketelitian tinggi dalam penentuan urutan hasil.</p><p> </p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jutisi Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35889/jutisi.v14i1.2657
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Decision Support System Models in Tourism Ambassador Selection

Siti Abidah, Wahyudi Ariannor, Muhammad Fajar Maulana
Jutisi Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi
Big Data and Business Intelligence
article

Evaluation of Decision Support System Models in Tourism Ambassador Selection

Siti Abidah, Wahyudi Ariannor, Muhammad Fajar Maulana
article en

Abstract

<p><em>Tourism Ambassador selection still faces issues of subjectivity in assessment, highlighting the need for an objective system to evaluate various aspects of participant competence. This study aimed to assess the performance of seven Decision Support System methods—SAW, WP, TOPSIS, MOORA, MAUT, PROMETHEE, and SMART—in a selection process based on four criteria: Public Speaking, Tourism Knowledge, English Proficiency, and Talent. Data from 12 participants were analyzed and evaluated using classification accuracy, Mean Absolute Error, Root Mean Square Error, and Spearman and Kendall rank correlations against the actual ranking. The results showed that PROMETHEE delivered the best performance, achieving 100% accuracy with perfect ranking alignment. These findings indicate that PROMETHEE is highly suitable for multi-criteria selection processes requiring high precision in determining result order.</em><em></em></p><p><strong><em>K</em></strong><strong><em>eywords</em></strong><strong><em>:</em></strong><em> Decision Support System; PROMETHEE method; Multi-criteria selection; Method evaluation; Tourism Ambassador</em><em></em></p><p align="center"> </p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Pemilihan Duta Pariwisata masih menghadapi persoalan subjektivitas dalam penilaian, sehingga diperlukan sistem yang lebih objektif untuk menilai berbagai aspek kompetensi peserta. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi kinerja tujuh metode Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, yaitu <em>SAW, WP, TOPSIS, MOORA, MAUT, PROMETHEE</em> dan <em>SMART</em>, dalam proses seleksi berbasis empat kriteria: <em>Public Speaking</em>, Kepariwisataan, Bahasa Inggris, dan Bakat. Data dari 12 peserta dianalisis dan dievaluasi menggunakan metrik akurasi klasifikasi, <em>Mean Absolute Error, Root Mean Square Error</em>, serta korelasi Spearman dan Kendall terhadap ranking asli. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa <em>PROMETHEE</em> memberikan performa terbaik dengan akurasi 100% dan kesesuaian ranking yang sempurna. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa PROMETHEE sangat tepat diterapkan dalam proses seleksi multi-kriteria yang memerlukan ketelitian tinggi dalam penentuan urutan hasil.</p><p> </p>

Jutisi Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Informatika dan Sistem InformasiVol. 14(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.