Improving Systematic Literature Reviews: A Narrative Guideline to Structure the Analysis Stage

Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) have been used in various disciplines to explore existing research on a particular topic. SLRs are important for identifying research gaps, providing guidelines for practice and informing policy. There are several guidelines for conducting SLRs which focus mainly on providing methodological steps to ensure rigour and transparency. The initial steps of a SLR have detailed guidance. However, the analysis and evaluation steps lacks detailed guidance leading to quality challenges of reporting of their findings. With rigour during the analysis of the SLR, the findings could become more logical and relevant to practice and policy-making. The purpose of this paper is to develop guidelines for conducting analysis and synthesis during a SLR to improve the relevance and use of the findings as a basis for policy-making, practice and academia. The analysis guideline will show how findings from the SLRs can inform the regulations and standards of the different fields or industries. The paper will show how analysis is conducted in such that it assists practitioners to make informed decisions and know actions that need to be taken in their fields or industries. Lastly, researchers in academia usually conduct SLRs, and this paper will guide them in how to conduct SLR analysis based on their purpose and targeted outcome. A narrative review was used to identify the patterns to improve rigour and transparency during the analysis of a SLR. The findings from the narrative review show that the analysis process depends on the purpose and the targeted outcome of the SLR. If the outcome of the SLR is to identify research gaps, publication metric analysis should be included because it assists in identifying contextual, population and methodological gaps. On the other hand, to identify knowledge gaps, concepts should be identified, effects and interconnections should be determined. An extensive analysis should also be conducted to build a model and framework. The guidelines provided in this paper should assist researchers in improving the analysis process of a SLR, leading to usable findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34190/ejbrm.23.2.4033
Primary Topic
Academic Writing and Publishing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Systematic Literature Reviews: A Narrative Guideline to Structure the Analysis Stage

Annlizé L. Marnewick, Ntombiyokusa Nyoni, Carl Marnewick
The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods
Academic Writing and Publishing
article

Improving Systematic Literature Reviews: A Narrative Guideline to Structure the Analysis Stage

Annlizé L. Marnewick, Ntombiyokusa Nyoni, Carl Marnewick
article en

Abstract

Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) have been used in various disciplines to explore existing research on a particular topic. SLRs are important for identifying research gaps, providing guidelines for practice and informing policy. There are several guidelines for conducting SLRs which focus mainly on providing methodological steps to ensure rigour and transparency. The initial steps of a SLR have detailed guidance. However, the analysis and evaluation steps lacks detailed guidance leading to quality challenges of reporting of their findings. With rigour during the analysis of the SLR, the findings could become more logical and relevant to practice and policy-making. The purpose of this paper is to develop guidelines for conducting analysis and synthesis during a SLR to improve the relevance and use of the findings as a basis for policy-making, practice and academia. The analysis guideline will show how findings from the SLRs can inform the regulations and standards of the different fields or industries. The paper will show how analysis is conducted in such that it assists practitioners to make informed decisions and know actions that need to be taken in their fields or industries. Lastly, researchers in academia usually conduct SLRs, and this paper will guide them in how to conduct SLR analysis based on their purpose and targeted outcome. A narrative review was used to identify the patterns to improve rigour and transparency during the analysis of a SLR. The findings from the narrative review show that the analysis process depends on the purpose and the targeted outcome of the SLR. If the outcome of the SLR is to identify research gaps, publication metric analysis should be included because it assists in identifying contextual, population and methodological gaps. On the other hand, to identify knowledge gaps, concepts should be identified, effects and interconnections should be determined. An extensive analysis should also be conducted to build a model and framework. The guidelines provided in this paper should assist researchers in improving the analysis process of a SLR, leading to usable findings.

The Electronic Journal of Business Research MethodsVol. 23(2)
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Academic Writing and Publishing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.