Bragg-peak FLASH biological optimization enables enhanced normal tissue sparing and dose escalation for ocular stereotactic body radiation therapy

<i>Objective.</i>To evaluate proton Bragg peak FLASH for ocular treatments to enhance normal tissue sparing and enable dose escalation via FLASH biological optimization (FBO).<i>Approach.</i>The FLASH-sparing factors for normal tissues were derived from the literature in modeling the phenomenological FLASH normal tissue sparing effect. Using the single-energy BP-FLASH technique (SEBP-FLASH), an in-house treatment planning system was implemented with the FLASH FBO module. Ten consecutive ocular patients who were treated using conventional dose rate intensity-modulated proton therapy (CONV-IMPT) to 50 Gy in 5 fractions were replanned using the FLASH technique. The dose metrics for the OARs were compared using the two different techniques. The fraction dose was then intentionally escalated from 10 to 12 Gy through FBO to assess whether the plans still met clinical constraints.<i>Main results.</i>In the FLASH regimen without FBO (50 Gy/5 fractions), all ipsilateral OAR dosimetric metrics met clinical objectives with safe margins. While the clinical CONV-IMPT approach demonstrated slightly better dosimetric performance than SEBP-FLASH plans, the incorporation of FBO improved all OAR dose metrics beyond those of CONV- IMPT, except for the mean dose to the cornea (no difference). When the target dose was increased from 50 to 60 Gy using FBO, all OARs remained within clinical limits. The mean and maximum doses to the cornea increased from 11.7 to 15.4 Gy and from 22.8 to 23.6 Gy, respectively, when transitioning from 50 Gy CONV-IMPT to 60 Gy FBO. However, in the 60 Gy FBO plans, the maximum doses were reduced for the eye (102.0%-87.0%), optic nerves (98.7%-74.0%), retina (100.5%-81.8%), lacrimal gland (84.9%-73.2%), and conjunctiva (91%-72.3%).<i>Significance.</i>SEBP-FLASH achieves plan quality comparable to CONV-IMPT using 50 Gy/5 fractions and enables dose escalation via FLASH FBO while meeting clinical standards, potentially improving tumor control with acceptable toxicity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae0ef7
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bragg-peak FLASH biological optimization enables enhanced normal tissue sparing and dose escalation for ocular stereotactic body radiation therapy

Jenghwa Chang, Christopher A. Barker, Haibo Lin, Minglei Kang et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
article

Bragg-peak FLASH biological optimization enables enhanced normal tissue sparing and dose escalation for ocular stereotactic body radiation therapy

Jenghwa Chang, Christopher A. Barker, Haibo Lin, Minglei Kang, Charles B. Simone, Grant Lattery, Tyler Kaulfers, Huifang Zhai, Xingyi Zhao, Chingyun Cheng, Balaji Selvaraj, Muhammad Hamza
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>To evaluate proton Bragg peak FLASH for ocular treatments to enhance normal tissue sparing and enable dose escalation via FLASH biological optimization (FBO).<i>Approach.</i>The FLASH-sparing factors for normal tissues were derived from the literature in modeling the phenomenological FLASH normal tissue sparing effect. Using the single-energy BP-FLASH technique (SEBP-FLASH), an in-house treatment planning system was implemented with the FLASH FBO module. Ten consecutive ocular patients who were treated using conventional dose rate intensity-modulated proton therapy (CONV-IMPT) to 50 Gy in 5 fractions were replanned using the FLASH technique. The dose metrics for the OARs were compared using the two different techniques. The fraction dose was then intentionally escalated from 10 to 12 Gy through FBO to assess whether the plans still met clinical constraints.<i>Main results.</i>In the FLASH regimen without FBO (50 Gy/5 fractions), all ipsilateral OAR dosimetric metrics met clinical objectives with safe margins. While the clinical CONV-IMPT approach demonstrated slightly better dosimetric performance than SEBP-FLASH plans, the incorporation of FBO improved all OAR dose metrics beyond those of CONV- IMPT, except for the mean dose to the cornea (no difference). When the target dose was increased from 50 to 60 Gy using FBO, all OARs remained within clinical limits. The mean and maximum doses to the cornea increased from 11.7 to 15.4 Gy and from 22.8 to 23.6 Gy, respectively, when transitioning from 50 Gy CONV-IMPT to 60 Gy FBO. However, in the 60 Gy FBO plans, the maximum doses were reduced for the eye (102.0%-87.0%), optic nerves (98.7%-74.0%), retina (100.5%-81.8%), lacrimal gland (84.9%-73.2%), and conjunctiva (91%-72.3%).<i>Significance.</i>SEBP-FLASH achieves plan quality comparable to CONV-IMPT using 50 Gy/5 fractions and enables dose escalation via FLASH FBO while meeting clinical standards, potentially improving tumor control with acceptable toxicity.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(21)
Northwell Health (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Hofstra University (US), Hemel Hempstead Hospital (GB), New York Proton Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.