STI DoxyPEP, Antimicrobial Resistance and Queer Stewardship

The emergence of STI prophylaxis using doxycycline (aka DoxyPEP) amongst gay and bisexual men (GBMSM) has been positively received by healthcare professionals (Molina et al. 2018; Cornelisse et al. 2023; Leutkemeyer et al. 2023), community health organisations (Weil & Nutland 2023), and community members (Holt et al. 2024). Alongside high acceptability, integrating DoxyPEP into clinical medicine has raised clear issues about antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and complex disruption of the human microbiome (Bachmann et al. 2024). These issues present new challenges for community health research and practice, including refining existing HIV/STI prevention strategies and new methods for engaging communities in conversations about sustainable antibiotic use and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) (Broder 2020; Weil 2023, 2024). This paper brings together interviews with UK clinicians with scholarship on STI/HIV health promotion to consider how emergent use of DoxyPEP plays into the making of queer AMS. I demonstrate how clinicians establish links between microbiome health and generalised antibiotic consumption to construct AMS principles. Based on these principles, I consider what a queer AMS might look like for GBMSM, including social and ethical procedures for assembling safer sexual practices and deterring onward transmission of bacterial STIs (Davis et al. 2022). Building upon Davis et al.’s (2022) work, I argue that the assemblage of normative and non-normative use of DoxyPEP constitutes queer AMS through the negotiation of what I call a ‘threshold of acceptable STI transmission’. Attending to this threshold might allow healthcare practitioners to stay with social complexity (Law 2004; Haraway 2016) and multiply engage with sexual communities (Epstein 2022) to cultivate queer AMS. Finally, when sufficiently contextualised and localised within larger debates about AMR, queer AMS can enable new understandings of how GBMSM actively understand and/or contest biomedical power through negotiated safer sex practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/8k3xc_v1
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

STI DoxyPEP, Antimicrobial Resistance and Queer Stewardship

Chase Ledin
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

STI DoxyPEP, Antimicrobial Resistance and Queer Stewardship

Chase Ledin
article en

Abstract

The emergence of STI prophylaxis using doxycycline (aka DoxyPEP) amongst gay and bisexual men (GBMSM) has been positively received by healthcare professionals (Molina et al. 2018; Cornelisse et al. 2023; Leutkemeyer et al. 2023), community health organisations (Weil & Nutland 2023), and community members (Holt et al. 2024). Alongside high acceptability, integrating DoxyPEP into clinical medicine has raised clear issues about antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and complex disruption of the human microbiome (Bachmann et al. 2024). These issues present new challenges for community health research and practice, including refining existing HIV/STI prevention strategies and new methods for engaging communities in conversations about sustainable antibiotic use and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) (Broder 2020; Weil 2023, 2024). This paper brings together interviews with UK clinicians with scholarship on STI/HIV health promotion to consider how emergent use of DoxyPEP plays into the making of queer AMS. I demonstrate how clinicians establish links between microbiome health and generalised antibiotic consumption to construct AMS principles. Based on these principles, I consider what a queer AMS might look like for GBMSM, including social and ethical procedures for assembling safer sexual practices and deterring onward transmission of bacterial STIs (Davis et al. 2022). Building upon Davis et al.’s (2022) work, I argue that the assemblage of normative and non-normative use of DoxyPEP constitutes queer AMS through the negotiation of what I call a ‘threshold of acceptable STI transmission’. Attending to this threshold might allow healthcare practitioners to stay with social complexity (Law 2004; Haraway 2016) and multiply engage with sexual communities (Epstein 2022) to cultivate queer AMS. Finally, when sufficiently contextualised and localised within larger debates about AMR, queer AMS can enable new understandings of how GBMSM actively understand and/or contest biomedical power through negotiated safer sex practices.

University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

STI DoxyPEP, Antimicrobial Resistance and Queer Stewardship — Chase Ledin · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS